Citation network
Singer Sewing Machine Co. Vs. Brickell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 06, 1914
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 304 (1914) U.S. Supreme Court Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. BrickellSearch
-
U.S. 304 (1914) Singer Sewing Machine Company v. BrickellSearch
-
filled from stock in that state, the business is interstate commerce and not subject to a state license tax. Crenshaw v. ArkansasSearch
-
decree of the district court is not now directly under review, but, at any rate, it was clearly correct under Crenshaw v. ArkansasSearch
-
the correctness of the decision, so far as the commerce clause is concerned, seems to us equally clear under Ement v. MissouriSearch
-
if applied in Russell County, it would burden interstate commerce are readily distinguishable. In United States v. ReeseSearch
-
all commerce by confining it to the interstate commerce that alone was subject to the control of Congress. In Leloup v. PortSearch
-
R. Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Ry. Co. v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 216 U. S. 27 . In Williams v. TalladegaSearch
-
engaged in other occupations more or less like it ought to be similarly taxed. This is not such a case. Connolly v. UnionSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Cook v. MarshallSearch
-
U. S. 114 , 217 U. S. 121 . In Quartlebaum v. StateSearch
-
Ballou v. StateSearch
-
Page 233 U. S. 317 The cases cited from the state courts lend no support to appellant's argument. Mobile v. CraftSearch
-
Tuscaloosa v. HolczsteinSearch
-
Ala. 636, and Gambill v. EndrichSearch
-
of the respective municipalities thereunder, and have no direct bearing upon the present question. In Montgomery v. KellySearch
-
and therefore unconstitutional. Mefford v. SheffieldSearch
-
Alabama Consolidated Coal Co. v. HerzbergSearch
-
and the foregoing section is repugnant to the state and federal constitutions under the authority of Montgomery v. KellySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. BrickellSearch
-
Singer Sewing Machine Company v. BrickellSearch
-
Crenshaw v. ArkansasSearch
-
Ement v. MissouriSearch
-
In United States v. ReeseSearch
-
of Congress. In Leloup v. PortSearch
-
In Williams v. TalladegaSearch
-
Connolly v. UnionSearch
-
In Quartlebaum v. StateSearch
-
Ballou v. StateSearch
-
Mobile v. CraftSearch
-
and Gambill v. EndrichSearch
-
In Montgomery v. KellySearch
-
Mefford v. SheffieldSearch
-
of Montgomery v. KellySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial