Citation network
Hull Vs. Burr
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 1914
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 712 (1914) U.S. Supreme Court Hull v. BurrSearch
-
U.S. 712 (1914) Hull v. BurrSearch
-
attacked, and could be assailed only by a direct proceeding in a competent court, citing New Lamp Chimney Co. v. AnsoniaSearch
-
Graham v. BostonSearch
-
the authority of the court first acquiring jurisdiction, the parties being the same, must prevail, citing Marshall v. HolmesSearch
-
U. S. 589 , 141 U. S. 596 , and Central National Bank v. StevensSearch
-
matter of mere inference or argument, but clearly and distinctly, that the suit arises under some federal law. Hanford v. DaviesSearch
-
Mountain View Mining & Milling Co. v. McFaddenSearch
-
Bankers Casualty Co. v. MinneapolisSearch
-
that reason maintainable in the district court as a suit arising under the laws of the United States, See Freeman v. HoweSearch
-
Minnesota Co. v. MilwaukeeSearch
-
Dewey v. WestSearch
-
Morgans' Co. v. TexasSearch
-
Byers v. McAuleySearch
-
Carey v. HoustonSearch
-
Pope v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Wabash Railroad v. AdelbertSearch
-
Stat. 335), and has been constantly observed by the courts. See Diggs v. WolcottSearch
-
United States v. Parkhurst-DavisSearch
-
Hunt v. NewSearch
-
Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
proceedings in a state court which would have the effect of defeating or impairing such jurisdiction. French v. HaySearch
-
Deitzsch v. HuidekoperSearch
-
Julian v. CentralSearch
-
have been made parties. To this point, a decision of the Florida supreme court in the very action is cited ( Hull v. BurrSearch
-
the court first obtaining jurisdiction of a controversy should be permitted to proceed without interference. Peck v. JennessSearch
-
Central Nat. Bank v. StevensSearch
-
Bigelow v. OldSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hull v. BurrSearch
-
New Lamp Chimney Co. v. AnsoniaSearch
-
and Central National Bank v. StevensSearch
-
of the United States, See Freeman v. HoweSearch
-
See Diggs v. WolcottSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial