Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Selig Vs. Hamilton

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 22, 1914

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 4 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Finney Vs. Guy US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1903
  2. Bernheimer Vs. Converse US Supreme Court · May 27, 1907
    Relied / Followed
  3. Converse Vs. Hamilton US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1912
    Relied / Followed
  4. Hale Vs. Allinson US Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1903
  5. U.S. 652 (1914) U.S. Supreme Court Selig v. Hamilton
    Search
  6. U.S. 652 (1914) Selig v. Hamilton
    Search
  7. courts of that state, has heretofore been reviewed and its constitutional validity upheld by this Court in Bernheimer v. Converse
    Search
  8. U. S. 516 , and Converse v. Hamilton
    Search
  9. decree establishing such indebtedness is admissible as evidence thereof in a suit against a stockholder. Bernheimer v. Converse
    Search
  10. stockholders, as construed by the state court, was reviewed and its constitutional validity was upheld in Bernheimer v. Converse
    Search
  11. U. S. 516 . The conclusions there reached were reaffirmed in Converse v. Hamilton
    Search
  12. See Willis v. Mabon
    Search
  13. McKusick v. Seymour
    Search
  14. Minneapolis Baseball Co. v. City
    Search
  15. Hanson v. Davison
    Search
  16. Straw & Ellsworth Co. v. Kilbourne
    Search
  17. Way v. Barney
    Search
  18. of all the creditors against all the stockholders, or as many as could be served with process within the state. Hale v. Allinson
    Search
  19. the Act of 1899 (c. 272) was passed, and under the provisions of this statute as continued in substance ( Way v. Barney
    Search
  20. and the obligation assumed with respect to its debts, to be represented by it in the proceeding. Straw & Ellsworth Co. v. Kilbourne
    Search
  21. And in Gunnison v. U.S
    Search
  22. the statutory method of enforcing the stockholder's liability. It was not corporate assets ( Minneapolis Baseball Co. v. City
    Search
  23. which bore upon the extent or duration of his stockholding, or any other personal defense. Straw & Ellsworth Co. v. Kilbourne
    Search
  24. submission to the reasonable regulations of the state for the purpose of making the liability effectual. Bernheimer v. Converse
    Search
  25. liable, and we should not be justified in treating the order as expressing less than its terms stated. In Tiffany v. Giesen
    Search
  26. and the obligation he had assumed, was sufficiently represented by the presence of the corporation itself ( Bernheimer v. Converse
    Search
  27. of the New York Code of Civil Procedure. In Bernheimer v. Converse
    Search
  28. See Platt v. Wilmot
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Selig v. Hamilton
    Search
  30. and Converse v. Hamilton
    Search
  31. Gunnison v. U.S
    Search
  32. In Tiffany v. Giesen
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial