Citation network
Ross Vs. Oregon
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 27, 1913
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 150 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Ross v. OregonSearch
-
U.S. 150 (1913) Ross v. OregonSearch
-
legislation looks to the future and changes existing conditions by making new laws to be applicable hereafter. Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
the passage of the depository act, the supreme court of the state had occasion to consider and determine, in Baker v. WilliamsSearch
-
educational funds out of the custom or right of the treasurer to make general deposits which was recognized in Baker v. WilliamsSearch
-
the making of laws, not their construction by the courts. It has been so regarded from the beginning. In Calder v. BullSearch
-
the provision was considered, it was spoken of as reaching legislative, but not judicial, acts, and in Fletcher v. PeckSearch
-
a decision of a court construing a statute, but that question was both presented and decided in Commercial Bank v. BuckinghamSearch
-
A like question was presented, and similarly disposed of, in New Orleans Water Works Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
And in Brown v. SmartSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
laws. Many other cases give effect to this ruling, but it will suffice to cite, from among them, Central Land Co. v. LaidleySearch
-
Turner v. WilkesSearch
-
Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. LouisianaSearch
-
of some other instrumentality of the state exercising delegated legislative authority. New Orleans Water Works Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
Davis & Farnum Manufacturing Co. v. LosSearch
-
Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
quite plain that the ruling was a judicial act, and not an exercise of legislative authority. As was said in Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
The plaintiff in error cites the cases of Kring v. MissouriSearch
-
Muhlker v. NewSearch
-
Gelpcke v. DubuqueSearch
-
Wall. 175, and Butz v. MuscatineSearch
-
the third and fourth were explained in Central Land Co. v. LaidleySearch
-
U. S. 207 , 163 U. S. 221 -223, and Turner v. WilkesSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ross v. OregonSearch
-
Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Baker v. WilliamsSearch
-
In Calder v. BullSearch
-
Commercial Bank v. BuckinghamSearch
-
New Orleans Water Works Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
Brown v. SmartSearch
-
of Kring v. MissouriSearch
-
and Butz v. MuscatineSearch
-
and Turner v. WilkesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial