Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Knight Vs. Lane

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 17, 1913

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 4 linked 22 unlinked
Show
  1. New Orleans Vs. Paine US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1893
  2. Ness Vs. Fisher US Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1912
  3. Gritts Vs. Fisher US Supreme Court · May 13, 1912
  4. United States Vs. Schurz US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  5. U.S. 6 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Knight v. Lane
    Search
  6. U.S. 6 (1913) Knight v. Lane
    Search
  7. from the government, inquiry as to all equitable rights comes within the cognizance of the Land Department. Brown v. Hitchock
    Search
  8. or his successor as are the interlocutory decrees of a court open to review upon the final hearing. New Orleans v. Paine
    Search
  9. of the discretion confided to him by law, cannot be reviewed, nor can he be compelled to retract it, by mandamus. Ness v. Fisher
    Search
  10. in the distribution and allotment of the tribal funds and lands were sustained in the recent decision in Gritts v. Fisher
    Search
  11. kindred proceedings in the Land Department, which is well stated in the following excerpts from the opinion in Brown v. Hitchcock
    Search
  12. government, inquiry as to all equitable rights comes within the cognizance of the Land Department. In United States v. Schurz
    Search
  13. his rights as against a proceeding in the Land Department, or when the Department refuses to act at all. United States v. Schurz
    Search
  14. supra, and Noble v. Union
    Search
  15. As entirely apposite, we repeat the statement in New Orleans v. Orleans
    Search
  16. and discretion confided to him by law, it cannot be reviewed, or he be compelled to retract it, by mandamus. Ness v. Fisher
    Search
  17. U. S. 683 . The decisions in Garfield v. United
    Search
  18. States, 211 U. S. 249 , and Ballinger v. Frost
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Knight v. Lane
    Search
  20. of the Land Department. Brown v. Hitchock
    Search
  21. Brown v. Hitchcock
    Search
  22. of the Land Department. In United States v. Schurz
    Search
  23. and Noble v. Union
    Search
  24. New Orleans v. Orleans
    Search
  25. Garfield v. United
    Search
  26. and Ballinger v. Frost
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial