Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Wright

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 26, 1913

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 5 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Keitel US Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1908
  2. United States Vs. Biggs US Supreme Court · Jan 04, 1909
  3. United States Vs. Patten US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1913
  4. United States Vs. Sutton US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1909
  5. United States Vs. Kagama US Supreme Court · May 10, 1886
  6. U.S. 226 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Wright
    Search
  7. U.S. 226 (1913) United States v. Wright
    Search
  8. Act upon it, and also the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the eighth circuit in United States Express Co. v. Friedman
    Search
  9. F. 673, and Mosier v. United
    Search
  10. The present case is clearly within this act, as previously interpreted and applied. United States v. Sutton
    Search
  11. United States v. Miller
    Search
  12. United States v. George
    Search
  13. United States v. Anderson
    Search
  14. United States v. Pacific
    Search
  15. a citizen of the United States, and his allotment ceased to be Indian country under the accepted definition ( Bates v. Clark
    Search
  16. a term defined in Bates v. Clark
    Search
  17. Clairmont v. United
    Search
  18. for the changes consequent upon the adoption of the policy of allotting the Indian lands in severalty. Hallowell v. United
    Search
  19. of the Oklahoma Enabling Act. The history has been so recently rehearsed that it need not be here repeated. Tiger v. Western
    Search
  20. Heckman v. United
    Search
  21. Mullen v. United
    Search
  22. Goat v. United
    Search
  23. Deming Investment Co. v. United
    Search
  24. there is Indian country or governmental trusteeship over Indian lands or guardianship over the Indians. United States v. Sutton
    Search
  25. U. S. 291 , 215 U. S. 295 . Such legislation is of undoubted constitutionality, United States v. Kagama
    Search
  26. subject matter in other states remained, as it still remains, under federal control. In United States Exp. Co. v. Friedman
    Search
  27. at least with respect to the introduction of liquor into the Indian country from points outside the state. In Mosier v. United
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Wright
    Search
  29. United States Express Co. v. Friedman
    Search
  30. and Mosier v. United
    Search
  31. Bates v. Clark
    Search
  32. Hallowell v. United
    Search
  33. Tiger v. Western
    Search
  34. the Indians. United States v. Sutton
    Search
  35. In United States Exp. Co. v. Friedman
    Search
  36. In Mosier v. United
    Search
  37. United States v. Stevenson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial