Citation network
Minnesota Rate Case
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 09, 1913
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of calculation of value is the fair value of the property of the carrier used for the convenience of the public. Smyth v. AmesSearch
-
of the Railroad & Warehouse Commission prosecute these appeals. The penal provisions being separable ( Reagan v. Farmers'Search
-
Willcox v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
West. Un. Tel. Co. v. RichmondSearch
-
relation of rates involves, it is found, substantial and unjust discrimination in fact against the interstate localities. v. AfterSearch
-
This conclusion necessarily results from the supremacy of the national power within its appointed sphere. M'Culloch v. MarylandSearch
-
Smith v. AlabamaSearch
-
Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. InterstateSearch
-
Southern Railway Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Mondou v. NewSearch
-
and, when Congress does act, the exercise of its authority overrides all conflicting state legislation. Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
Welton v. MissouriSearch
-
Mobile County v. KimballSearch
-
Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Bowman v. ChicagoSearch
-
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. HefleySearch
-
Robbins v. ShelbySearch
-
Philadelphia & Southern Mail S.S. Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Leloup v. MobileSearch
-
Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. TexasSearch
-
Meyer v. WellsSearch
-
Crandall v. NevadaSearch
-
Kelley v. RhoadsSearch
-
U. S. 504 . They have no power to prohibit interstate trade in legitimate articles of commerce ( Bowman v. ChicagoSearch
-
Vance v. VandercookSearch
-
Oklahoma v. KansasSearch
-
L. & N. R. Co. v. CookSearch
-
Brewing Co., 223 U. S. 70 ), or to discriminate against the products of other states ( Ward v. MarylandSearch
-
Hannibal & St. J. R. Co. v. HusenSearch
-
Darnell v. MemphisSearch
-
or others engaged in interstate commerce, or to fetter by conditions their right to carry it on ( Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
Reagan v. Farmers'Search
-
M'Culloch v. MarylandSearch
-
Cooley v. BoardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial