Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Macleod Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 10, 1913

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 1 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Fleming Vs. Page US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  2. MacLeod v. United
    Search
  3. States - 229 U.S. 416 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court MacLeod v. United
    Search
  4. States, 229 U.S. 416 (1913) MacLeod v. United
    Search
  5. the United States had not occupied and which were in possession of insurgent de facto governments. United States v. Heinszen
    Search
  6. to the territory acquired by conquest and afterwards ceded by the Mexican government to the United States. Cross v. Harrison
    Search
  7. How. 164. See also in this connection, Fleming v. Page
    Search
  8. New York v. Steamship
    Search
  9. Dooley v. United
    Search
  10. Thornington v. Smith
    Search
  11. Law Digest, pp. 995 et seq. While differing somewhat in its circumstances, the case of United States v. Rice
    Search
  12. were subject to the military authority there, and the authority of a conquering power, recognized in New Orleans v. Steamship
    Search
  13. and places occupied by the United States. And such authority is subject to the laws and usages of war ( New Orleans v. Steamship
    Search
  14. law. A state of war as to third persons continued until the exchange of treaty ratifications ( Dooley v. United
    Search
  15. The history of this act and others growing out of the Spanish-American War is fully set forth in United States v. Heinszen
    Search
  16. to order the imposition of duties subsequent to the ratification of the treaty, with reference to Porto Rico ( Dooley v. United
    Search
  17. States, supra ), and with reference to the Philippine Islands ( Fourteen Diamond Rings v. United
    Search
  18. action of the authorities in the Philippines as was done in accordance with the orders of the President. In Lincoln v. United
    Search
  19. States and Page 229 U. S. 434 Warner, Barnes & Co. v. United
    Search
  20. Lincoln and Warner, Barnes & Co. cases), Congress passed the ratifying act now in question. United States v. Heinszen
    Search
  21. founded upon the principles of international law. The act has the scope given to it in the case of United States v. Heinszen
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court MacLeod v. United
    Search
  23. United States v. Heinszen
    Search
  24. the United States. Cross v. Harrison
    Search
  25. of United States v. Rice
    Search
  26. New Orleans v. Steamship
    Search
  27. Fourteen Diamond Rings v. United
    Search
  28. of the President. In Lincoln v. United
    Search
  29. Warner, Barnes & Co. v. United
    Search
  30. of United States v. Heinszen
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial