Citation network
Adams Vs. Russell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 10, 1913
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 353 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Adams v. RussellSearch
-
U.S. 353 (1913) Adams v. RussellSearch
-
In Eustis v. BollesSearch
-
then it must appear that such ground was a good and valid one, sufficient to sustain the judgment. Klinger v. MissouriSearch
-
Wall. 257, 80 U. S. 263 . Otherwise, Page 229 U. S. 359 as was said in Neilson v. LagowSearch
-
ground be not good and valid, it will not be presumed that the judgment was based upon it. See also Maguire v. TylerSearch
-
that quality, and there be uncertainty as to the ground of decision, this Court will not assume jurisdiction. Dibble v. BellinghamSearch
-
U. S. 149 . In Commercial Bank v. RochesterSearch
-
adverse to the exemption of the securities of the United States from state taxation. In Railroad Company v. RockSearch
-
Wall. 177, and Insurance Company v. TreasurerSearch
-
of two grounds of decision, federal and local, and this Court declined to review the judgments. See also Todd v. DanielSearch
-
Pet. 521. In Bachtel v. WilsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
these circumstances, it was held that this Court had no jurisdiction, and the writ of error was dismissed. Johnson v. RiskSearch
-
U. S. 300 , was cited. No opinion was given by the state court in Bachtel v. WilsonSearch
-
did the record disclose the specific ground upon which the court proceeded. In such case, we said in Johnson v. RiskSearch
-
certificate of the supreme court to that effect, or the assertion in the judgment that such was the fact. DeSaussure v. GaillardSearch
-
Commonwealth v. BrownSearch
-
Oliver v. OliverSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Adams v. RussellSearch
-
Klinger v. MissouriSearch
-
Dibble v. BellinghamSearch
-
In Commercial Bank v. RochesterSearch
-
In Railroad Company v. RockSearch
-
and Insurance Company v. TreasurerSearch
-
In Bachtel v. WilsonSearch
-
Johnson v. RiskSearch
-
DeSaussure v. GaillardSearch
-
Neilson v. LagowSearch
-
Bachtel v. WilsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial