Citation network
Citizens' Tel. Co. Vs. Fuller
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 10, 1913
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 322 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Citizens' Tel. Co. v. FullerSearch
-
U.S. 322 (1913) Citizens' Telephone Company v. FullerSearch
-
requires the legislature to provide a uniform rule of taxation, except on property paying specific taxes. The People v. TheSearch
-
Board of Supervisors v. AuditorSearch
-
Page 229 U. S. 329 Co. v. CitySearch
-
of legislation, classification is within the competency of the legislature. We said in American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
and a discrimination was supported between taxation of producers and manufacturers of products, and yet, in Billings v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 97 , 188 U. S. 102 , we compared the rule with that in Connolly v. UnionSearch
-
and the cases which have explained the principle and the range of its legal exercise. In Bell's Gap Railroad Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
In Pacific Express Company v. SeibertSearch
-
was supported. The range of classification for taxing purposes which was expressed in Bell's Gap Railroad Company v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
and Home Insurance Co. v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 606 -607, was approved. These cases and others were cited in Michigan Central Railroad Company v. PowersSearch
-
In Travelers' Insurance Co. v. ConnecticutSearch
-
which imposed a tax on the stock of nonresidents in corporations and exempted the stock of residents. In King v. MullinsSearch
-
tracts of 1,000 acres or less and tracts of more than 1,000 acres. It was sustained. In Consolidated Coal Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
by reason of its limitation to mines where more than five men were employed at any one time. See also McLean v. ArkansasSearch
-
H. R. Co. v. NewSearch
-
roads of less than fifty miles in length, was declared not unconstitutional and discriminatory. To like effect is Dow v. BeidelmanSearch
-
of railroads by their length in fixing the rate of passengers' fare was sustained. In Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. AdamsSearch
-
of the property, measured by miles, and was in lieu of taxes levied directly on the property. Held valid. In Magoun v. IllinoisSearch
-
be exercised in classifying those subjects when not obviously exercised in a spirit of prejudice and favoritism. Cook v. MarshallSearch
-
U. S. 165 . The cases decided subsequent to the decision in Bell's Gap Railroad Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
select the differences upon which the classification shall be based, and they need not be great or conspicuous. Keeney v. NewSearch
-
See Quong v. KirkendallSearch
-
if we had doubt of the sufficiency of the title to give notice of the purpose of the legislation. See Attorney General v. AmosSearch
-
Grimm v. SecretarySearch
-
Detroit v. SchmidSearch
-
People v. HowardSearch
-
Detroit v. ChapinSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Citizens' Tel. Co. v. FullerSearch
-
Citizens' Telephone Company v. FullerSearch
-
The People v. TheSearch
-
Co. v. CitySearch
-
Billings v. IllinoisSearch
-
Connolly v. UnionSearch
-
In Bell's Gap Railroad Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Bell's Gap Railroad Company v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Michigan Central Railroad Company v. PowersSearch
-
In King v. MullinsSearch
-
In Consolidated Coal Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
McLean v. ArkansasSearch
-
In New York, N.H. & H. R. Co. v. NewSearch
-
In Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. AdamsSearch
-
In Magoun v. IllinoisSearch
-
Cook v. MarshallSearch
-
Bell's Gap Railroad Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial