Citation network
Luria Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 20, 1913
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Luria v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 231 U.S. 9 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Luria v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 231 U.S. 9 (1913) Luria v. UnitedSearch
-
more than providing for annulling letters of citizenship to which the possessors were never entitled. Johannessen v. UnitedSearch
-
R. Co. v. TurnipseedSearch
-
for an invention, and the defendant is not entitled to a trial by jury under the Seventh Amendment. United States v. BellSearch
-
stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects save that of eligibility to the Presidency. Minor v. HappersettSearch
-
Osborn v. BankSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
statute, it was unlawful, for what is clearly implied is as much a part of a law as what is expressed. United States v. BabbitSearch
-
South Carolina v. UnitedSearch
-
of merely colorable letters of citizenship, to which their possessors never were lawfully entitled. Johannessen v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 225 U. S. 227 . See also Wallace v. AdamsSearch
-
Railroad Co. v. TurnipseedSearch
-
Of like import are Fong Yue Ting v. UnitedSearch
-
Adams v. NewSearch
-
Lindsley v. NaturalSearch
-
This Court applied that rule in Webb v. DenSearch
-
Thompson v. MissouriSearch
-
U. S. 380 , and Reitler v. HarrisSearch
-
Page 231 U. S. 28 not legal, and this, according to the prescribed tests, made it a suit in equity. Parsons v. BedfordSearch
-
Root v. RailwaySearch
-
not differ from a suit to cancel a patent for public land or letters patent for an invention. See United States v. StoneSearch
-
United States v. SanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Luria v. UnitedSearch
-
Johannessen v. UnitedSearch
-
the Seventh Amendment. United States v. BellSearch
-
the Presidency. Minor v. HappersettSearch
-
Wallace v. AdamsSearch
-
Fong Yue Ting v. UnitedSearch
-
and Reitler v. HarrisSearch
-
Parsons v. BedfordSearch
-
See United States v. StoneSearch
-
Bailey v. AlabamaSearch
-
Hopt v. UtahSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial