Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Baltic Mining Co. Vs. Massachusetts

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 03, 1913

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

41 entries 8 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. Vs. Kansas US Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1910
  2. Pullman Co. Vs. Kansas US Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1910
  3. Provident Institution Vs. Massachusetts US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1867
  4. United States Express Co. Vs. Minnesota US Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1912
  5. Southern Pacific Co. Vs. Denton US Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1892
  6. Barron Vs. Burnside US Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1887
  7. Western Union Telegraph Co. Vs. Andrews US Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1910
    Relied / Followed
  8. Hammond Packing Co. Vs. Arkansas US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1909
  9. U.S. 68 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Baltic Mining Co. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  10. U.S. 68 (1913) Baltic Mining Company v. Massachusetts
    Search
  11. of their property without due process of law or deny them the equal protection of the law. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas
    Search
  12. Southern Railway Co. v. Green
    Search
  13. Ry. Co. v. Texas
    Search
  14. Page 231 U. S. 83 interstate commerce does not exempt its property from state taxation. United States Express Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  15. as such, but are taken as a mere measure of a tax of lawful authority within the state, has been sustained. Maine v. Grand
    Search
  16. Hamilton Co. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  17. Flint v. Stone
    Search
  18. is denied in the exclusion of such corporation, is but the correlative of the power to exclude. Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas
    Search
  19. Insurance Co. v. Morse
    Search
  20. Herndon v. Chicago
    Search
  21. We have no fault to find with the conclusion that this is an excise tax. See also Provident Inst. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  22. Hamilton Mfg. Co. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  23. to corporations which have places of business for the transaction solely of interstate commerce. Attorney General v. Electric
    Search
  24. property beyond the jurisdiction of the state within the authority of the Kansas cases, Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas
    Search
  25. supra. These cases have been followed by others similar in character. Ludwig v. Western
    Search
  26. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. O'Connor
    Search
  27. Oklahoma v. Wells
    Search
  28. Fargo & Co., 223 U. S. 298 . In Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas
    Search
  29. and Pullman Co. v. Kansas
    Search
  30. the imposition of the tax denies the equal protection of the laws, and this upon the authority of Southern Railway Co. v. Greene
    Search
  31. The conditions existing in the Southern Railway Co. v. Greene
    Search
  32. U.S. Supreme Court Baltic Mining Co. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  33. Baltic Mining Company v. Massachusetts
    Search
  34. Maine v. Grand
    Search
  35. Provident Inst. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  36. Hamilton Mfg. Co. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  37. Attorney General v. Electric
    Search
  38. Ludwig v. Western
    Search
  39. In Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas
    Search
  40. of Southern Railway Co. v. Greene
    Search
  41. the Southern Railway Co. v. Greene
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial