Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Pullman Co. Vs. Croom

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 22, 1913

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 5 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Ex Rel. BernardIn Vs. Butterworth US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1898
    Relied / Followed
  2. United States Vs. Boutwell US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  3. Marshall Vs. Dye US Supreme Court · Dec 01, 1913
  4. Warner Valley Stock Co. Vs. Smith US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1897
    Relied / Followed
  5. Caledonian Coal Co. Vs. Baker US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1905
  6. U.S. 571 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Pullman Co. v. Croom
    Search
  7. U.S. 571 (1913) Pullman Co. v. Croom
    Search
  8. provision for continuing it against his successor, abates upon his death or retirement from office. United States. v. Boutwell
    Search
  9. to this rule are boards and bodies of quasi -corporate character having continuous existence. Marshall v. Dye
    Search
  10. for the year 1911, and statements concerning the payment of the taxes for 1909 Page 231 U. S. 574 and 1910. W. V. Knott
    Search
  11. tax, and is legal. An appeal was likewise sued out to this Court. On April 21, 1913, by stipulation and order, W. V. Knott
    Search
  12. W. v. Knott
    Search
  13. was the Comptroller in this case. The leading case upon substitution of parties in such cases in United States v. Boutwell
    Search
  14. uniformly followed and applied to suits for injunction as well as for the writ of mandamus. Warner Valley Stock Co. v. Smith
    Search
  15. U. S. 28 , 165 U. S. 33 . And in United States ex Rel. Bernardin v. Butterworth
    Search
  16. for them in suits commenced against the latter in their official capacity. Subsequently, in Caledonian Coal Co. v. Baker
    Search
  17. U. S. 432 , 196 U. S. 442 , this Court held, after noticing the cases of United States v. Boutwell
    Search
  18. and United States ex Rel. Bernardin v. Butterworth
    Search
  19. Page 231 U. S. 577 and bodies of a quasi -corporate character having a continuing existence. See Marshall v. Dye
    Search
  20. ante, p. 231 U. S. 250 . In Richardson v. McChesney
    Search
  21. for the substitution of McChesney's successor in a suit of this character. The case is governed by United States v. Boutwell
    Search
  22. U. S. 600 , and Caledonian Coal Co. v. Baker
    Search
  23. the matter being still within the control of the court, there having been no final judgment in the case ( Iowa v. Illinois
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Pullman Co. v. Croom
    Search
  25. Rel. Bernardin v. Butterworth
    Search
  26. of United States v. Boutwell
    Search
  27. See Marshall v. Dye
    Search
  28. In Richardson v. McChesney
    Search
  29. and Caledonian Coal Co. v. Baker
    Search
  30. Iowa v. Illinois
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial