Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Peters Vs. Broward

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 09, 1912

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 2 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Leeper Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1891
  2. Burgess Vs. Seligman US Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1883
  3. U.S. 483 (1912) U.S. Supreme Court Peters v. Broward
    Search
  4. U.S. 483 (1912) Peters v. Broward
    Search
  5. litigation between different parties, was held null and void insofar as its land grant clauses are concerned. Wade v. Atlantic
    Search
  6. the journals, the latter will control, under the express decision of the highest court of the State of Florida. Wade v. Atlantic
    Search
  7. under obligation to follow the adjudications of the courts of the state whose law is in question. South Ottawa v. Perkins
    Search
  8. hold that the bill had a sufficient title and was a valid law. It is true that the issues in the case of Wade v. Atlantic
    Search
  9. But the question of whether the enactment was a valid law is a judicial question. In the case of the State of Florida v. Brown
    Search
  10. from such journals it appeared that the law in question had not been constitutionally enacted. See also State ex Rel. v. Green
    Search
  11. Fla. 154. In view of the cases cited, we find the Florida court saying, in Wade v. Atlantic
    Search
  12. The suggestion that the rights of the appellant or his assignors arose before the decision in Wade v. Atlantic
    Search
  13. therefore one in which this Court should exercise an independent judgment under the authority of such cases as Burgess v. Seligman
    Search
  14. know the law or did not make such examination. There is therefore no reason for declining to follow the case of Wade v. Atlantic
    Search
  15. Lumber Co. In South Ottawa v. Perkins
    Search
  16. to be true. But in point of law, evidence of the facts stated would not help the matter. The Florida court, in Wade v. Atlantic
    Search
  17. Peters v. Gilchrist
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court Peters v. Broward
    Search
  19. Wade v. Atlantic
    Search
  20. of the State of Florida. Wade v. Atlantic
    Search
  21. South Ottawa v. Perkins
    Search
  22. of Wade v. Atlantic
    Search
  23. of the State of Florida v. Brown
    Search
  24. Rel. v. Green
    Search
  25. Peters v. Gilchrist
    Search
  26. Wilkes County v. Coler
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial