Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Meyer Vs. Wells, Fargo and Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 19, 1912

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 3 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. Vs. Andrews US Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1910
  2. Fargo Vs. Hart US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1904
  3. People's National Bank Vs. Marye US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1903
  4. Meyer v. Wells
    Search
  5. Fargo & Co. - 223 U.S. 298 (1912) U.S. Supreme Court Meyer v. Wells
    Search
  6. Fargo & Co., 223 U.S. 298 (1912) Meyer v. Wells
    Search
  7. interstate business, a state cannot include income from investments in bonds and lands outside of the state. Fargo v. Hart
    Search
  8. and as such is an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. Texas
    Search
  9. not bound, in order to maintain the bill, to tender so much a would have fallen on intrastate receipts. People's Bank v. Marye
    Search
  10. tax is what it calls itself, it is bad on the former ground, and that, whatever it is, it is bad on the latter. Fargo v. Hart
    Search
  11. the tax a property tax. It is so similar to the Texas statute held bad in Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. Texas
    Search
  12. and taxed in a different way. It would be difficult to apply to a tax levied in these days the explanation of Maine v. Grand
    Search
  13. Trunk Ry. Co., 142 U. S. 217 , given in Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. Texas
    Search
  14. Flint v. Stone
    Search
  15. There is nothing sufficient to indicate such a limitation, and, for the reasons given above, on the authority of Fargo v. Hart
    Search
  16. any objection to testing the validity of this tax in an equity suit, or that any such objection was made below. Brown v. Lake
    Search
  17. to take the case out of the general rule established by the cases collected in Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise
    Search
  18. City, 213 U. S. 276 . See Ludwig v. Western
    Search
  19. this case, which is not like one where the law simply fails to allow certain proper deductions. People's National Bank v. Marye
    Search
  20. construed as separable, of course, would be ultimately for the state court in any event. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Texas
    Search
  21. state, which possibly might be read as intended to reach such receipts as it could, even if less than all ( Ratterman v. Western
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Meyer v. Wells
    Search
  23. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. Texas
    Search
  24. People's Bank v. Marye
    Search
  25. of Maine v. Grand
    Search
  26. of Fargo v. Hart
    Search
  27. Brown v. Lake
    Search
  28. Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise
    Search
  29. See Ludwig v. Western
    Search
  30. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Texas
    Search
  31. Ratterman v. Western
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial