Citation network
Philadelphia Co. Vs. Stimson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 04, 1912
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 605 (1912) U.S. Supreme Court Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSearch
-
U.S. 605 (1912) Philadelphia Company v. StimsonSearch
-
of the complainant in regard to property not within its jurisdiction, and may compel obedience to its decree. Phelps v. McDonaldSearch
-
within the rule that it will not affect the boundary line, it must be perceptible when it takes place. Nebraska v. IowaSearch
-
and the power of Congress over navigation has no limit except those prescribed in the Constitution. Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
Congress to decide what shall or shall not be deemed in judgment of law an obstruction to navigation. Pennsylvania v. WheelingSearch
-
liability to persons whose rights of property they have wrongfully Page 223 U. S. 620 invaded. Little v. BarremeSearch
-
United States v. LeeSearch
-
Belknap v. SchildSearch
-
has frequently been applied with respect to state officers seeking to enforce unconstitutional enactments. Osborn v. BankSearch
-
Ludwig v. WesternSearch
-
Hopkins v. ClemsonSearch
-
applicable to a federal officer acting in excess of his authority or under an authority not validly conferred. Noble v. UnionSearch
-
School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySearch
-
from bringing criminal proceedings to compel obedience to unconstitutional requirements. Davis & Farnum Mfg. Co. v. LosSearch
-
Dobbins v. LosSearch
-
as between conflicting claimants under the local law. It was not to restrain trespass. Northern Indiana R. Co. v. MichiganSearch
-
Ellenwood v. MariettaSearch
-
Chair Co., 158 U. S. 105 . It was not brought to try the naked question of the title to the land. Massie v. WattsSearch
-
of a court of equity which has control of the person of the defendant and may compel obedience to its decree. Phelps v. McDonaldSearch
-
for the protection of commerce and navigation is not of itself an injury to property, and cannot be restrained. Yesler v. WashingtonSearch
-
Prosser v. NorthernSearch
-
private rights, and thus to prevent him from enjoying what is asserted to be the lawful use of his property. Prosser v. NorthernSearch
-
and perceptibly abandons its old channel, the title is not affected, and the boundary remains at the former line. Rex v. YarboroughSearch
-
Gifford v. YarboroughSearch
-
New Orleans v. UnitedSearch
-
Jefferis v. EastSearch
-
Mulry v. NortonSearch
-
the Mississippi and the Missouri, notwithstanding the extent and rapidity of the changes constantly effected. Jefferis v. EastSearch
-
Page 223 U. S. 626 St. Clair County v. LovingstonSearch
-
supra. In Nebraska v. IowaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSearch
-
Philadelphia Company v. StimsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial