Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Shulthis Vs. Mcdougal

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 07, 1912

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 4 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Shoshone Mining Co. Vs. Rutter US Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1900
  2. Rouse Vs. Letcher US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1895
  3. Hanford Vs. Davies US Supreme Court · May 18, 1896
  4. United States Vs. Pridgeon US Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1894
    Relied / Followed
  5. U.S. 561 (1912) U.S. Supreme Court Shulthis v. McDougal
    Search
  6. U.S. 561 (1912) Shulthis v. McDougal
    Search
  7. a federal corporation, but is to be regarded for jurisdictional purposes as one of Oklahoma. Kansas Pacific R. Co. v. Atchison
    Search
  8. and if the decree is final in respect of the original suit, it is equally so in respect of the intervention. Rouse v. Letcher
    Search
  9. Gregory v. Van
    Search
  10. Pope v. Louisville
    Search
  11. St. Louis, K. C. & C. R. Co. v. Wabash
    Search
  12. been brought into the suit by the answers or in the course of the subsequent proceedings. Colorado Central Mining Co. v. Turck
    Search
  13. Tennessee v. Union
    Search
  14. Spencer v. Duplan
    Search
  15. Devine v. Los
    Search
  16. in the bill, for jurisdiction cannot rest on any ground that is not affirmatively and distinctly set forth. Hanford v. Davies
    Search
  17. Mountain View Mining Co. v. McFadden
    Search
  18. Bankers' Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis
    Search
  19. U. S. 570 as all titles in those states are traceable back to those laws. Little York Gold-Washing & Water Co. v. Keyes
    Search
  20. Colorado Central Mining Co. v. Turck
    Search
  21. Blackburn v. Portland
    Search
  22. Florida Central & P. Railroad Co. v. Bell
    Search
  23. De Lamar's Nevada Co. v. Nesbitt
    Search
  24. cannot be held that the case as therein stated was one arising under the statutes mentioned. As was said in Blackburn v. Portland
    Search
  25. one of the defendants, is a federal corporation, and therefore that, under the decisions of this Court in Osborn v. Bank
    Search
  26. the corporation laws of Arkansas been adopted and put in force by a local or territorial legislature. United States v. Pridgeon
    Search
  27. U. S. 48 , 153 U. S. 52 -54. In Kansas Pacific Railroad Co. v. Atchison
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Shulthis v. McDougal
    Search
  29. of Oklahoma. Kansas Pacific R. Co. v. Atchison
    Search
  30. Little York Gold-Washing & Water Co. v. Keyes
    Search
  31. Osborn v. Bank
    Search
  32. In Kansas Pacific Railroad Co. v. Atchison
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial