Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Jones Vs. Springer

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 02, 1912

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 9 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Scott Vs. Ellery US Supreme Court · Jan 04, 1892
  2. Jaquith Vs. Rowley US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1903
  3. Frank Vs. Vollkommer US Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1907
  4. Jennings Vs. Carson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1807
  5. Mueller Vs. Nugent US Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1902
  6. Conner Vs. Long US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1881
    Relied / Followed
  7. Clarke Vs. Larremore US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1903
    Relied / Followed
  8. Eyster Vs. Gaff US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  9. Fox Vs. Haarstick US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 1895
  10. U.S. 148 (1912) U.S. Supreme Court Jones v. Springer
    Search
  11. U.S. 148 (1912) Jones v. Springer
    Search
  12. cause for inquiry. It is argued that filing the petition in bankruptcy was a caveat to all the world, Mueller v. Nugent
    Search
  13. to decide this case, or what effect, if any, the proviso Page 226 U. S. 155 has upon some language in Conner v. Long
    Search
  14. U. S. 228 , relied upon by the appellant ( see Clarke v. Larremore
    Search
  15. But the proposition quoted from Mueller v. Nugent
    Search
  16. with reference to the facts then before the Court, and not as applicable to all intents and purposes. York Mfg. Co. v. Cassell
    Search
  17. Hiscock v. Varick
    Search
  18. as in custodia legis from the date of the petition, as against a subsequent attachment. Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman
    Search
  19. true that all power and jurisdiction of the local court were ended before notice of the bankruptcy proceedings. Eyster v. Gaff
    Search
  20. Revere Copper Co. v. Dimock
    Search
  21. is incident to such conditions. An illustration, although not a perfect analogy, is to found in United States v. Shipp
    Search
  22. U. S. 26 . The recognition of a power springing from necessity is of old standing in English law. Eyston v. Studd
    Search
  23. Baker v. Baker
    Search
  24. Ventris 313. See further Young v. Kellar
    Search
  25. Betterton v. Eppstein
    Search
  26. of the supreme court of the territory unless there are stronger reasons to the contrary than are shown here. Fox v. Haarstick
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Jones v. Springer
    Search
  28. York Mfg. Co. v. Cassell
    Search
  29. Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman
    Search
  30. Eyston v. Studd
    Search
  31. Young v. Kellar
    Search
  32. Albright v. Sandoval
    Search
  33. United States v. Shipp
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial