Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Reading Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 16, 1912

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 2 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Reading US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1855
  2. Loewe Vs. Lawlor US Supreme Court · Feb 03, 1908
  3. Co. - 226 U.S. 324 (1912) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Reading
    Search
  4. Co., 226 U.S. 324 (1912) United States v. Reading
    Search
  5. Act which it is the duty of the court to dissolve. Acts absolutely lawful may be steps in a criminal plot. Aikens v. Wisconsin
    Search
  6. plot to restrain interstate trade, and if so, may thereupon become unlawful under the Anti-Trust Act. Swift Co. v. United
    Search
  7. in other states for an illegal purpose, it is an interference with and restraint of interstate commerce. Loewe v. Lawlor
    Search
  8. and normal contracts to further trade through normal methods, whether by agreement or otherwise, Standard Oil Co. v. United
    Search
  9. which it is the duty of the court to dissolve, irrespective of how the legal title to the shares is held. Harriman v. Northern
    Search
  10. trade. So considered, they may be wholly innocent. Even acts absolutely lawful may be steps in a criminal plot. Aikens v. Wisconsin
    Search
  11. the statute, and, as parts of the scheme or plot, Page 226 U. S. 358 would be unlawful. Thus, in Swift & Co. v. United
    Search
  12. Swift & Co. v. United
    Search
  13. of these contracts upon interstate traffic in the coal of this region is indicated in Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baird
    Search
  14. But when there is only a probability, the intent to produce the consequences may become important. United States v. Terminal
    Search
  15. within the authority of a long line of cases decided by this Court. Among them we may cite Northern Securities Company v. United
    Search
  16. National Cotton Oil Company v. Texas
    Search
  17. Louis Terminal Association, 224 U. S. 383 , and the recent case of United States v. Union
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Reading
    Search
  19. Aikens v. Wisconsin
    Search
  20. the Anti-Trust Act. Swift Co. v. United
    Search
  21. Standard Oil Co. v. United
    Search
  22. Harriman v. Northern
    Search
  23. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baird
    Search
  24. United States v. Terminal
    Search
  25. Northern Securities Company v. United
    Search
  26. of United States v. Union
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial