Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Keatley Vs. Furey

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 23, 1912

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 3 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Converse Vs. Hamilton US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1912
  2. Relfe Vs. Rundle US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1881
  3. Bernheimer Vs. Converse US Supreme Court · May 27, 1907
  4. U.S. 399 (1912) U.S. Supreme Court Keatley v. Furey
    Search
  5. U.S. 399 (1912) Keatley v. Furey
    Search
  6. jurisdiction was involved. The appellant contends that the contrary appears on the face of the record. United States v. Larkin
    Search
  7. Herndon-Carter Co. v. James
    Search
  8. Whether the exception to the general rule concerning jurisdiction of appeals like this, established by Shepard v. Adams
    Search
  9. U. S. 618 , and Board of Trade v. Hammond
    Search
  10. denial of the right to intervene was not a discretionary decision, and final on that ground. Credits Commutation Co. v. United
    Search
  11. he got a title by virtue of it, as it was provided by statute in express terms that the receiver should, in Relfe v. Rundle
    Search
  12. U. S. 222 . See Great Western Mining Co. v. Harris
    Search
  13. not be considered in this case. In some instances, at least, it would be enforced outside of the state. Bernheimer v. Converse
    Search
  14. Converse v. Minnesota
    Search
  15. U. S. 243 , 224 U. S. 257 . See Chipman v. Manufacturers'
    Search
  16. Haskell v. Merrill
    Search
  17. but if the statute did not itself constitute the receiver the universal successor of the corporation, see Chipman v. Manufacturers'
    Search
  18. U. S. 404 Mass. 147-149, 30 N.E. 610, it may be doubted whether the deed had extraterritorial effect. See Fall v. Eastin
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Keatley v. Furey
    Search
  20. Shepard v. Adams
    Search
  21. and Board of Trade v. Hammond
    Search
  22. Credits Commutation Co. v. United
    Search
  23. See Great Western Mining Co. v. Harris
    Search
  24. See Chipman v. Manufacturers'
    Search
  25. Chipman v. Manufacturers'
    Search
  26. See Fall v. Eastin
    Search
  27. United States v. Larkin
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial