Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Sac and Fox Indians Vs. Sac and Fox Indians

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 24, 1911

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 1 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Pugh US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  2. Sac and Fox Indians v. Sac
    Search
  3. and Fox Indians - 220 U.S. 481 (1911) U.S. Supreme Court Sac and Fox Indians v. Sac
    Search
  4. and Fox Indians, 220 U.S. 481 (1911) Sac and Fox Indians of the Mississippi in Iowa v. Sac
    Search
  5. one in equity, and this Court follows the rule not to go behind the findings of the Court of Claims. United States v. Old
    Search
  6. Michigan Ry. Co. v. Powers
    Search
  7. S. 484 379, 191 U. S. 387 . The government did not deal with individuals, but with tribes. Blackfeather v. United
    Search
  8. States, 190 U. S. 369 , 190 U. S. 377 . See Fleming v. McCurtain
    Search
  9. question were open, we should not be prepared to find that there was a failure in that respect. See United States v. Crusell
    Search
  10. U. S. 265 . New York Indians v. United
    Search
  11. and equitable jurisdiction, the appeal opens the findings of fact for reconsideration, as was held in United States v. Old
    Search
  12. to inconsistent statutes, and to provide for an arbitration on the footing of what may seem fair. See United States v. Old
    Search
  13. Pam-To-Pee v. United
    Search
  14. it makes no admission, but simply provides for a trial on the merits. See Stewart v. United
    Search
  15. Indians. 2. If this Court may go behind the findings, as I think it may, on the authority of United States v. Old
    Search
  16. U.S. Supreme Court Sac and Fox Indians v. Sac
    Search
  17. Iowa v. Sac
    Search
  18. of the Court of Claims. United States v. Old
    Search
  19. the President. See Wisconsin & Michigan Ry. Co. v. Powers
    Search
  20. Blackfeather v. United
    Search
  21. See Fleming v. McCurtain
    Search
  22. See United States v. Crusell
    Search
  23. New York Indians v. United
    Search
  24. United States v. Old
    Search
  25. See United States v. Old
    Search
  26. See Stewart v. United
    Search
  27. of United States v. Old
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales