Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Light Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 01, 1911

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 3 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Wilcox Vs. Jackson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1839
  2. Butte City Water Co. Vs. Baker US Supreme Court · Jan 03, 1905
  3. United States Vs. Grimaud US Supreme Court · May 03, 1911
    Relied / Followed
  4. Light v. United
    Search
  5. States - 220 U.S. 523 (1911) U.S. Supreme Court Light v. United
    Search
  6. States, 220 U.S. 523 (1911) Light v. United
    Search
  7. From the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado Syllabus United States V. Grimaud
    Search
  8. been definitely settled, it is primarily a grant of power to the United States of control over its property, Kansas v. Colorado
    Search
  9. so far as it can, decide cases before it without reference to questions arising under the federal Constitution. Siler v. Louisville
    Search
  10. to the Secretary legislative power. We need not discuss that question, in view of the opinion in United States v. Grimaud
    Search
  11. that these lands, thus left open, might be used so long as the government did not cancel its tacit consent. Buford v. Hout
    Search
  12. States of the power of recalling any implied license under which the land had been used for private purposes. Steele v. United
    Search
  13. Canfield v. United
    Search
  14. terms on which its property may be used. As it can withhold or reserve the land, it can do so indefinitely. Stearns v. Minnesota
    Search
  15. Van Brocklin v. Anderson
    Search
  16. United States v. Trinidad
    Search
  17. they have no application to cases where they are driven upon unfenced land in order that they may feed there. Lazarus v. Phelps
    Search
  18. Monroe v. Cannon
    Search
  19. St. Louis Cattle Co. v. Vaught
    Search
  20. The Union Pacific v. Rollins
    Search
  21. United States is required to fence its property, or the other constitutional questions involved. For, as said in Siler v. Louisville
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Light v. United
    Search
  23. Constitution. Siler v. Louisville
    Search
  24. Buford v. Hout
    Search
  25. Steele v. United
    Search
  26. Stearns v. Minnesota
    Search
  27. Siler v. Louisville
    Search
  28. United States v. Beebe
    Search
  29. Kansas v. Colorado
    Search
  30. Lazarus v. Phelps
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales