Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Briscoe Vs. Rudolph

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 29, 1911

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 3 linked 23 unlinked
Show
  1. Wight Vs. Davidson US Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1901
  2. Columbia Heights Realty Co. Vs. Rudolph US Supreme Court · May 16, 1910
    Relied / Followed
  3. Fauntleroy Vs. Lum US Supreme Court · May 18, 1908
  4. U.S. 547 (1911) U.S. Supreme Court Briscoe v. Rudolph
    Search
  5. U.S. 547 (1911) Briscoe v. Rudolph
    Search
  6. of this Court, require assignments of error and apply to appeals from courts of the District of Columbia. Realty Co. v. Rudolph
    Search
  7. This Court, under Rule 21, can, and in this case, as the appeal was taken before the decision in Realty Co. v. Rudolph
    Search
  8. Whether a special assessment for benefits of a street opening is excessive is a question of fact. English v. Arizona
    Search
  9. to appeals from the courts of the District of Columbia, as we pointed out in the case of Columbia Heights Realty Co. v. Rudolph
    Search
  10. excessiveness of a special assessment for benefits resulting from a public street improvement is one of fact. English v. Arizona
    Search
  11. be but an exercise of the power of taxation for a public purpose in an area carved out for the purpose. In Webster v. Fargo
    Search
  12. therein according to the benefits received by property within such district has been more than once affirmed. Bawman v. Ross
    Search
  13. Martin v. District
    Search
  14. abide by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the pending case of Wight v. Davidson
    Search
  15. for the collection of the amount. Thereupon this bill was filed and the sale has ever since stood enjoined. Wight v. Davidson
    Search
  16. is no more subject to collateral impeachment than if the court had been exercising its general jurisdiction. Secombe v. Railroad
    Search
  17. United States Use of Hine v. Morse
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court Briscoe v. Rudolph
    Search
  19. of the District of Columbia. Realty Co. v. Rudolph
    Search
  20. Realty Co. v. Rudolph
    Search
  21. English v. Arizona
    Search
  22. of Columbia Heights Realty Co. v. Rudolph
    Search
  23. In Webster v. Fargo
    Search
  24. Bawman v. Ross
    Search
  25. of Wight v. Davidson
    Search
  26. Secombe v. Railroad
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial