Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mcclellan Vs. Carland

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 11, 1910

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

23 entries 5 linked 18 unlinked
Show
  1. Whitney Vs. Dick US Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1906
  2. Virginia Vs. Rives US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1880
  3. Chicot County Vs. Sherwood US Supreme Court · Apr 03, 1893
  4. insurance Company Vs. Comstock US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1872
  5. Tindal Vs. Wesley US Supreme Court · May 10, 1897
  6. U.S. 268 (1910) U.S. Supreme Court McClellan v. Carland
    Search
  7. U.S. 268 (1910) McClellan v. Carland
    Search
  8. courts of England, and it cannot be impaired by subsequent state legislation creating courts of probate. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana
    Search
  9. already properly obtained of a suit and turn the matter over for adjudication to the state court. Chicot County v. Sherwood
    Search
  10. and, under this provision, we can undoubtedly issue writs of certiorari in all proper cases. Amer. Construction Co. v. Jacksonville
    Search
  11. In Whitney v. Dick
    Search
  12. and, as in Whitney v. Dick
    Search
  13. of citizenship in the court below, and, consequently, certiorari would not issue under the Act of 1891. In Whitney v. Dick
    Search
  14. of the United States, as construed and applied in the cases just cited -- In re Chetwood, 165 U.S., and Whitney v. Dick
    Search
  15. action of the court below. This rule was distinctly stated and the previous cases referred to, in Insurance Company v. Comstock
    Search
  16. Barber Asphalt Co. v. Morris
    Search
  17. creating probate courts, has been so recently before this Court as to require no further consideration now. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana
    Search
  18. over for adjudication to the state court. This, it has been steadily held, a federal court may not do. Chicot County v. Sherwood
    Search
  19. if not made a party to the suit, its rights would not have been concluded by any adjudication made therein. Tindal v. Wesley
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court McClellan v. Carland
    Search
  21. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana
    Search
  22. Amer. Construction Co. v. Jacksonville
    Search
  23. U.S., and Whitney v. Dick
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial