Citation network
Mclean Vs. Arkansas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 04, 1909
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 539 (1909) U.S. Supreme Court McLean v. ArkansasSearch
-
U.S. 539 (1909) McLean v. ArkansasSearch
-
to question those cases in which the right has been upheld and maintained against such legislation. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSearch
-
Adair v. UnitedSearch
-
S. 546 of the right of freedom of contract have been applied and enforced. Some of them are collected in Holden v. HardySearch
-
U. S. 366 , in which it was held that the hours of work in mines might be limited. In Knoxville Iron Co. v. HarbisonSearch
-
conflict with any provisions of the Constitution of the United States protecting the right of contract. In Frisbie v. UnitedSearch
-
for prosecuting pension claims was held to be a valid exercise of police power. In Soon Hing v. CrowleySearch
-
fixing maximum charges for the storage of grain, and prohibiting contracts for larger amounts, was held valid. Munn v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 113 . In Patterson v. BarkSearch
-
a misdemeanor for a shipmaster to pay a sailor any part of his wages in advance was held to be valid. In Gundling v. ChicagoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
judicial interference unless the act in question is unmistakably and palpably in excess of legislative power. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Virginia, Colorado, and perhaps in other states. In Illinois, they have been condemned as unconstitutional. Ramsey v. PeopleSearch
-
first sustained by a unanimous court, such an act was afterwards, upon rehearing, maintained by a divided court. State v. PeelSearch
-
This question is closely analogous to one that was before this Court in the case of St. Louis Consolidated Coal Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
the legislature is at liberty to adopt, provided it be not wholly arbitrary or unreasonable, as it was in Cotting v. KansasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court McLean v. ArkansasSearch
-
Allgeyer v. LouisianaSearch
-
In Knoxville Iron Co. v. HarbisonSearch
-
In Frisbie v. UnitedSearch
-
In Soon Hing v. CrowleySearch
-
Munn v. IllinoisSearch
-
In Patterson v. BarkSearch
-
In Gundling v. ChicagoSearch
-
Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Ramsey v. PeopleSearch
-
State v. PeelSearch
-
of St. Louis Consolidated Coal Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
Cotting v. KansasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial