Citation network
Standard Oil Co. Vs. Anderson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 01, 1909
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 215 (1909) U.S. Supreme Court Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSearch
-
U.S. 215 (1909) Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSearch
-
The accepted reason for it is that given by Page 212 U. S. 221 Chief Justice Shaw in the case of Farwell v. BostonSearch
-
in considerations of policy or rested upon historical tradition, there is a clear limitation to its extent. Guy v. DonaldSearch
-
driver, and responsible for his negligence, unless he specifically directs or brings about the negligent act. Quarman v. BurnettSearch
-
Jones v. MayorSearch
-
even in such cases, if the exclusive control over the driver be in the hirer, he may be responsible as master. Jones v. ScullardSearch
-
Q.B. 565. In the case of Murray v. CurrieSearch
-
The case of Rourke v. WhiteSearch
-
Donovan v. LaingSearch
-
Q.B. 629, and Union Steamship Company v. ClaridgeSearch
-
under the direction and control of another person, upon whose work they were engaged. In the case of Higgins v. WesternSearch
-
Page 212 U. S. 225 In many cases, this test has been followed. Among them are Parkhurst v. SwiftSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Kilroy v. CanalSearch
-
Wyllie v. PalmerSearch
-
Anderson v. BoyerSearch
-
Murray v. DwightSearch
-
R. Co. v. HardySearch
-
Consolidated Fireworks Co. v. KoehlSearch
-
Co. v. ProbstSearch
-
Kimball v. CushmanSearch
-
Johnson v. BostonSearch
-
Delory v. BlodgettSearch
-
rather than subordination, and is not enough to show that there has been a change of masters. The case of Driscoll v. TowleSearch
-
the defendant. Upon facts not differing in principle from those before us, the same conclusion was reached in Sanford v. StandardSearch
-
Johnson v. NetherlandsSearch
-
McGough v. RopnerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSearch
-
of Farwell v. BostonSearch
-
Quarman v. BurnettSearch
-
Jones v. ScullardSearch
-
of Murray v. CurrieSearch
-
of Rourke v. WhiteSearch
-
Donovan v. LaingSearch
-
and Union Steamship Company v. ClaridgeSearch
-
of Higgins v. WesternSearch
-
Parkhurst v. SwiftSearch
-
of Driscoll v. TowleSearch
-
Sanford v. StandardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial