Citation network
Coder Vs. Arts
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 05, 1909
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 223 (1909) U.S. Supreme Court Coder v. ArtsSearch
-
U.S. 223 (1909) Coder v. ArtsSearch
-
except with the consent of the defendant. This was the subject of full consideration and determination in Bardes v. TheSearch
-
courts jurisdiction over controversies concerning the property in possession of the bankruptcy courts. Whitney v. WenmanSearch
-
Murphy v. JohnSearch
-
A reference to the adjudications in this Court may assist in clearing the matter. Hewitt v. BerlinSearch
-
Act of March 3, 1891. Nor is the decision in the Berlin Machine Works case inconsistent with First National Bank v. ChicagoSearch
-
this fact appeared, the district court had no longer jurisdiction of the case, under the doctrine laid down in Bardes v. BankSearch
-
and upon which he was entitled to priority in the distribution of the assets. He did not, as was the case in Hewitt v. BerlinSearch
-
York Manufacturing Company v. CassellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
upon the property in the hands of the bankrupt's trustee. This method of procedure was recognized in Hutchinson v. OtisSearch
-
was incident to the claim, Cunningham v. GermanSearch
-
N.B.R. 479, 483. If the question should be held to come up as incident to the appeal on the proof, Cunningham v. GermanSearch
-
of the Revised Statutes. Rector v. CitySearch
-
St. Louis & Iron Mountain R. Co. v. TaylorSearch
-
U. S. 281 , 210 U. S. 293 . It is contended that a contrary ruling was made in Chapman v. BowenSearch
-
trustee's bare denial of the claim could not be relied on under that statute. Jersey City & Bergen Railroad Company v. MorganSearch
-
preference. In construing the Bankruptcy Act, this distinction must be kept constantly in mind. As was said in Githens v. ShifflerSearch
-
but it was uniformly recognized that, acting in good faith, a debtor might thus prefer one or more creditors. Stewart v. DunhamSearch
-
have been held to be only those which are actually fraudulent. It was so held in Lansing Boiler & Engine Works v. RyersonSearch
-
should have the same construction and effect as have for a long period of time been attributed to those words. Githens v. ShifflerSearch
-
of the act. In Githens v. ShifflerSearch
-
Cadogan v. KennettSearch
-
Lansing Boiler & Engine Works v. RyersonSearch
-
In dealing with this question this Court said, in Thompson v. FairbanksSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Coder v. ArtsSearch
-
Bardes v. TheSearch
-
Hewitt v. BerlinSearch
-
First National Bank v. ChicagoSearch
-
Bardes v. BankSearch
-
Cunningham v. GermanSearch
-
Jersey City & Bergen Railroad Company v. MorganSearch
-
Githens v. ShifflerSearch
-
Stewart v. DunhamSearch
-
In Githens v. ShifflerSearch
-
Thompson v. FairbanksSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial