Citation network
Murray Vs. Wilson Distilling Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 05, 1909
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Murray v. WilsonSearch
-
Distilling Co. - 213 U.S. 151 (1909) U.S. Supreme Court Murray v. WilsonSearch
-
Distilling Co., 213 U.S. 151 (1909) Murray v. WilsonSearch
-
an individual and a state cannot, against the objection of the state, be maintained in the federal courts. Christian v. AtlanticSearch
-
to be sued in its own courts by a creditor does not give that creditor the right to sue in a federal court. Chandler v. DixSearch
-
that business, the state does not thereby lose the exemption from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. South Carolina v. UnitedSearch
-
Acts S.Car. 1895, p. 721. This last-mentioned act is set out in full in a marginal note to the opinion in Scott v. DonaldSearch
-
direct to consumers. The act of 1896 was amended in particulars not necessary to be detailed, in March, 1897. In Vance v. VandercookSearch
-
to the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States was passed upon. The limited ruling made in Scott v. DonaldSearch
-
referred to as the Wilson Act. It was decided that, as the provisions in the prior act, which were held in Scott v. DonaldSearch
-
as it exerted the absolute control of the state over the purchase and sale of liquor within the state. In State v. FarnumSearch
-
of the Constitution and statutes, is removed beyond all possible controversy by the decision of this Court in Vance v. VandercookSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
by the Supreme Court of South Carolina to the state statute prior to the commencement of this litigation, in State v. FarnumSearch
-
and a state cannot, against the objection of the state, be maintained in a court of the United States. Thus, in Hagood v. SouthernSearch
-
In the subsequent case of Christian v. AtlanticSearch
-
Amendment that the judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to such suits. New Hampshire v. LouisianaSearch
-
Louisiana v. JunelSearch
-
Mayre v. ParsonsSearch
-
one of its creditors, a right would not exist in such creditor to sue the state in a court of the United States. Smith v. ReevesSearch
-
a mere contract creditor of the State of South Carolina, is not in anywise controlled by the ruling in South Carolina v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Murray v. WilsonSearch
-
Christian v. AtlanticSearch
-
the Eleventh Amendment. South Carolina v. UnitedSearch
-
In Vance v. VandercookSearch
-
In State v. FarnumSearch
-
Vance v. VandercookSearch
-
State v. FarnumSearch
-
of Christian v. AtlanticSearch
-
of the United States. Smith v. ReevesSearch
-
South Carolina v. UnitedSearch
-
Scott v. DonaldSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial