Citation network
Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. Vs. Stranahan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 01, 1909
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 320 (1909) U.S. Supreme Court Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. StranahanSearch
-
U.S. 320 (1909) Oceanic Steam Navigation Company v. StranahanSearch
-
the enforcement is not necessarily governed by the rules controlling the prosecution of criminal offenses. Wong Wing v. UnitedSearch
-
Hepner v. UnitedSearch
-
exceed their own authority, and assume that wrong may be done in order to prevent wrong being accomplished. McCray v. UnitedSearch
-
is not open to discussion that the statute as thus construed was within the power of Congress to enact. In Buttfield v. StranahanSearch
-
In Turner v. WilliamsSearch
-
for the legal proposition upon which this contention must rest, it is insisted, results from the ruling in Wong Wing v. UnitedSearch
-
controlling in the prosecution of criminal offenses, is clearly without merit, and is not open to discussion. Hepner v. UnitedSearch
-
statutory duty, and provide for their enforcement by civil suit instead of by criminal prosecution, as held in Hepner v. UnitedSearch
-
often manifested and hitherto deemed to be free from any possible constitutional question. Referring in Bartlett v. KaneSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of nothing but mischief, and we are satisfied that such a power was never intended to be given to them. Decatur v. PauldingSearch
-
See also Murray's Lessee et al. v. HobokenSearch
-
Improvement Co., 18 How. 272. In Passavant v. UnitedSearch
-
accompanied with the power to impose a penalty for undervaluation, was reiterated, and the doctrine of Bartlett v. KaneSearch
-
was applied. And the same principle was upheld in Origet v. HeddenSearch
-
apply a corrective by exceeding its own authority. But, as pointed out in the passage previously quoted from Bartlett v. KaneSearch
-
supra, and as often since emphasized by this Court ( McCray v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. StranahanSearch
-
Oceanic Steam Navigation Company v. StranahanSearch
-
Wong Wing v. UnitedSearch
-
McCray v. UnitedSearch
-
In Buttfield v. StranahanSearch
-
In Passavant v. UnitedSearch
-
of Bartlett v. KaneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial