Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

In Re Wood and Henderson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 18, 1908

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 5 linked 21 unlinked
Show
  1. White Vs. Schloerb US Supreme Court · May 28, 1900
  2. Bryan Vs. Bernheimer US Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1901
  3. Whitney Vs. Wenman US Supreme Court · May 29, 1905
  4. Toland Vs. Sprague US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1838
  5. Lathrop Vs. Drake US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  6. No other court has authority to determine the reasonable amount for which the transaction can stand. Swartz v. Frank
    Search
  7. It is a transfer in consideration of future services, to be reduced if found unreasonable in amount. In Furth v. Stahl
    Search
  8. The same statute was before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in the case of Bothe v. Pratt
    Search
  9. to the exclusion of the federal courts, unless the defendant consented to be sued in the federal court. Bardes v. The
    Search
  10. property, to be exercised when the district court had acquired jurisdiction of the bankrupt's property. Bardes v. The
    Search
  11. begun in the state court of Arkansas, that court would have answered, as did the Supreme Court of Missouri in Swartz v. Frank
    Search
  12. such as it was proper to extend in courts of law by the appropriate modes and proceedings of such courts. Shields v. Thomas
    Search
  13. Construing the Judiciary Act of 1789, it was said in Toland v. Sprague
    Search
  14. of one state has no jurisdiction in matters such as the sale of real property beyond the limits of the state. Boyce v. Grundy
    Search
  15. M. R. Co. v. Ward
    Search
  16. Northern Indiana R. Co. v. Michigan
    Search
  17. appropriate, in this connection, is the language of Mr. Justice Bradley, delivering the opinion of the court in Boyd v. United
    Search
  18. conferred, and to be in harmony with the design and scope of the act. As said by Mr. Justice Bradley, in Lathrop v. Drake
    Search
  19. Swartz v. Frank
    Search
  20. In Furth v. Stahl
    Search
  21. of Bothe v. Pratt
    Search
  22. Bardes v. The
    Search
  23. Boyce v. Grundy
    Search
  24. Miss. & M. R. Co. v. Ward
    Search
  25. Boyd v. United
    Search
  26. Shields v. Thomas
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial