Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Bobbs-merrill Co. Vs. Straus

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 01, 1908

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 5 linked 23 unlinked
Show
  1. American Tobacco Co. Vs. Werckmeister US Supreme Court · Dec 02, 1907
  2. Banks Vs. Manchester US Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1888
  3. Thompson Vs. Hubbard US Supreme Court · May 13, 1889
  4. Wheaton Vs. Peters US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1834
  5. Stephens Vs. Cady US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1852
  6. U.S. 339 (1908) U.S. Supreme Court Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus
    Search
  7. U.S. 339 (1908) Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus
    Search
  8. the law, and we have been especially confident that such must be the case, for the reason that this Court, in Bement v. National
    Search
  9. Cotton Tie Co. v. Simmons
    Search
  10. Tie case was indicated in the comments of the learned justice, speaking for this Court, in Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany
    Search
  11. the view that the case was one of infringement because of the reconstruction of the patented device. In Bement v. National
    Search
  12. the questions to be decided in this case. The question was supposed to be involved in the recent case of Cortelyou v. Johnson
    Search
  13. in the federal courts ( The Button Fastener case, supra ), for he said in the subsequent case of Park & Sons Co. v. Hartman
    Search
  14. White-Smith Music Co. v. Apollo
    Search
  15. following the previous cases of Wheaton v. Peters
    Search
  16. against anyone who undertook to realize a profit from its publication without authority of the author. Wheaton v. Peters
    Search
  17. of his work may be said to have been the main purpose of the copyright statutes. Speaking for this Court in Stephens v. Cady
    Search
  18. physical existence. It is an incorporeal right to print and publish the map, or, as said by Lord Mansfield in Millar v. Taylor
    Search
  19. a penalty. Relief is given in a single suit, one-half of the money recovered going to the United States. Werckmeister v. American
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus
    Search
  21. Bement v. National
    Search
  22. Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany
    Search
  23. In Bement v. National
    Search
  24. of Cortelyou v. Johnson
    Search
  25. of Park & Sons Co. v. Hartman
    Search
  26. of Wheaton v. Peters
    Search
  27. Millar v. Taylor
    Search
  28. the United States. Werckmeister v. American
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial