Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Keitel

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 14, 1908

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

20 entries 3 linked 17 unlinked
Show
  1. Hyde Vs. Shine US Supreme Court · May 29, 1905
  2. United States Vs. Budd US Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1892
  3. United States Vs. Hirsch US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  4. U.S. 370 (1908) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Keitel
    Search
  5. U.S. 370 (1908) United States v. Keitel
    Search
  6. although United States v. Trinidad
    Search
  7. Rev.Stat., can be predicated on acts made criminal after the enactment of the statute. Hyde v. Shine
    Search
  8. be taken by, and qualifications of, entrymen, notwithstanding the United States be paid the price of the lands. Hyde v. Shine
    Search
  9. power of disposition in one who acquired the land in compliance with the statute, was pointed out in United States v. Budd
    Search
  10. want of merit affirmatively appears from a prior adjudication of this Court. The case referred to is United States v. Trinidad
    Search
  11. the second clause unless the acts charged were antecedently made criminal is without merit, and is foreclosed by Hyde v. Shine
    Search
  12. the United States. And, indeed, the ruling in that case was but the reiteration of the prior rulings in United States v. Hirsch
    Search
  13. U. S. 33 , and Dealy v. United
    Search
  14. is accompanied in the statute. Besides, the contention is foreclosed by United States v. Trinidad
    Search
  15. United States, and, indeed, transactions generally of a like character formed the subject matter of the ruling in Hyde v. Shine
    Search
  16. need not be further pointed out, because its want of merit is conclusively established by the ruling in Hyde v. Shine
    Search
  17. where a like contention was decided to be without foundation. The attempt to distinguish this case from Hyde v. Shine
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Keitel
    Search
  19. United States v. Trinidad
    Search
  20. and Dealy v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial