Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Smithers Vs. Smith

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 25, 1907

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 5 linked 21 unlinked
Show
  1. Barry Vs. Edmunds US Supreme Court · Feb 07, 1886
  2. Wiley Vs. Sinkler US Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1900
  3. Chicago Vs. Mills US Supreme Court · Feb 04, 1907
  4. Wetmore Vs. Rymer US Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1898
  5. Blair Vs. Chicago US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1906
  6. U.S. 632 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court Smithers v. Smith
    Search
  7. U.S. 632 (1907) Smithers v. Smith
    Search
  8. is subject to review in this Court in respect of the rulings of law and findings of fact upon the evidence. Wetmore v. Rymer
    Search
  9. the defendants' wrongful act measures, for jurisdictional purposes, the value of the matter in controversy, Smith v. Greenhow
    Search
  10. it appears that, as a matter of law, it is not possible for the plaintiff to recover the jurisdictional amount. Lee v. Watson
    Search
  11. Schacker v. Hartford
    Search
  12. Vance v. Vandercook
    Search
  13. North American Company v. Morrison
    Search
  14. defense might be interposed to a sufficient amount of the claim to reduce it below the jurisdictional amount. Schunk v. Moline
    Search
  15. it does not exclude the power of the court to protect itself against fraud. This was pointed out in Smith v. Greenhow
    Search
  16. and magnified fraudulently beyond the jurisdictional amount, the action should be dismissed. Globe Refining Co. v. Landa
    Search
  17. the federal courts, and, whatever the motive of his preference may have been, he had the right to act upon it. Blair v. Chicago
    Search
  18. may proceed upon motion of the parties or upon his own motion, and, if he chooses, without trial by jury. Williams v. Nottawa
    Search
  19. and cannot be compelled to submit to a trial of another kind. This was clearly stated by Mr. Justice Matthews in Barry v. Edmunds
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court Smithers v. Smith
    Search
  21. Smith v. Greenhow
    Search
  22. Lee v. Watson
    Search
  23. Schunk v. Moline
    Search
  24. Globe Refining Co. v. Landa
    Search
  25. Williams v. Nottawa
    Search
  26. Scott v. Donald
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial