Citation network
Quinlan Vs. Green County
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 08, 1907
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Quinlan v. GreenSearch
-
County - 205 U.S. 410 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court Quinlan v. GreenSearch
-
County, 205 U.S. 410 (1907) Quinlan v. GreenSearch
-
At the April term, 1871, the supreme court of the state rendered a decision in the case of Mercer v. KentuckySearch
-
had been performed, that would have been conclusive in favor of a bona fide holder. Provident Trust. Co. v. MercerSearch
-
a right to impose and did impose by the vote of its electors had not been complied with. Citizens' Savings Association v. PerrySearch
-
of ascertaining and determining whether the condition of the issue of the bonds had been complied with. Coloma v. EavesSearch
-
the condition from the facts of subscription and issue. In the first case dealing with this question ( Knox County v. AspinwallSearch
-
subsequent cases have limited the adjudication to the precise point necessarily decided. Citizens' Savings Association v. PerrySearch
-
County, ub. sup. In Marshall County v. SchenckSearch
-
The same dictum was in substance repeated by the same justice in Lexington v. ButlerSearch
-
Wall. 282, 81 U. S. 296 . In Pendleton County v. AmySearch
-
the decision was based upon the ground that the retention of the stock created an estoppel. In the case of Coloma v. EavesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 484 , the opinion of the Court lends some countenance to the broad principle stated in Knox County v. AspinwallSearch
-
the Court in this case so far as it may be construed to reaffirm the first point asserted in the case of Knox County v. AspinwallSearch
-
hands of an innocent holder any other defense than a want of power of the maker was arrested by the cases of Buchanan v. LitchfieldSearch
-
U. S. 278 , and Citizens' Savings Association v. PerrySearch
-
been fulfilled. But these cases in no way conflict with the view expressed by Mr. Justice Strong in Pendleton County v. AmySearch
-
and by Mr. Justice Bradley in Coloma v. EavesSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Quinlan v. GreenSearch
-
of Mercer v. KentuckySearch
-
Provident Trust. Co. v. MercerSearch
-
Citizens' Savings Association v. PerrySearch
-
Coloma v. EavesSearch
-
Knox County v. AspinwallSearch
-
In Marshall County v. SchenckSearch
-
Lexington v. ButlerSearch
-
In Pendleton County v. AmySearch
-
of Coloma v. EavesSearch
-
of Knox County v. AspinwallSearch
-
of Buchanan v. LitchfieldSearch
-
and Citizens' Savings Association v. PerrySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial