Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Chambers Vs. Baltimore and Ohio R. Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 18, 1907

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 2 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Ward Vs. Maryland US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1870
  2. Cole Vs. Cunningham US Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1890
  3. Chambers v. Baltimore
    Search
  4. Ohio R. Co. - 207 U.S. 142 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court Chambers v. Baltimore
    Search
  5. Ohio R. Co., 207 U.S. 142 (1907) Chambers v. Baltimore
    Search
  6. is enough to give this Court the authority to reexamine that question on writ of error. San Jose Land & Water Company v. San
    Search
  7. Haire v. Rice
    Search
  8. not left to depend upon comity between the states, but is granted and protected by the federal Constitution. Corfield v. Coryell
    Search
  9. at the instant when he was vivus et mortuus, and made to survive and pass to his representatives ( Higgins v. Railroad
    Search
  10. of Pennsylvania. The applicable section is section 19 of the act of 1851. Of it the Pennsylvania court said in Fink v. Garman
    Search
  11. This is the settled interpretation of the act. Mann v. Weiand
    Search
  12. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Bock
    Search
  13. McCafferty v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  14. persons a right to sue in case the Constitution forbids it to make the more limited grant that it attempts. Connolly v. Union
    Search
  15. can be maintained in any jurisdiction where the wrongdoer may be found and be brought before the court. Dennick v. Railroad
    Search
  16. These views are supported by the former decisions of this and other courts. In the leading case of Corfield v. Coryell
    Search
  17. In Paul v. Virginia
    Search
  18. So, in Ward v. Maryland
    Search
  19. Wall. 418, 79 U. S. 430 , the Court, after referring to Corfield v. Coryell
    Search
  20. In Cole v. Cunningham
    Search
  21. In the more recent case of Blake v. McClung
    Search
  22. be supreme if any right given by it could be overridden either by state enactment or by judicial decision. In Higgins v. Central
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Chambers v. Baltimore
    Search
  24. San Jose Land & Water Company v. San
    Search
  25. Constitution. Corfield v. Coryell
    Search
  26. Higgins v. Railroad
    Search
  27. Fink v. Garman
    Search
  28. Mann v. Weiand
    Search
  29. Connolly v. Union
    Search
  30. Dennick v. Railroad
    Search
  31. of Corfield v. Coryell
    Search
  32. Corfield v. Coryell
    Search
  33. of Blake v. McClung
    Search
  34. In Higgins v. Central
    Search
  35. Blake v. McClung
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial