Citation network
The Hamilton
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 23, 1907
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
authority that otherwise Delaware would possess -- a question that seems to have been considered doubtful in Butler v. BostonSearch
-
law jurisdiction of the state courts over torts committed at sea. This, we believe, always has been admitted. Martin v. HunterSearch
-
caused by a tort might be enforced in a state court, although the tort was committed at sea. American Steamboat Co. v. ChaseSearch
-
ocean, notwithstanding some expressions of doubt. The same conclusion was reached in McDonald Page 207 U. S. 405 v. MallorySearch
-
N.Y. 546, where the death occurred on the high seas. Sherlock v. AllingSearch
-
answers any argument based on the power of Congress over commerce, as to which we hardly need refer also to Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
in insolvency of such a vessel over an attachment levied immediately upon her arrival at New York, in Crapo v. KellySearch
-
Wall. 610. That decision was regarded as necessitating the conclusion reached in McDonald v. MallorySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
but without further recapitulation of the authorities, we are of opinion that the statute is valid. See Workman v. NewSearch
-
all cases which it is competent to govern, or at least, not to be confined to deaths occasioned on land. McDonald v. MallorySearch
-
U. S. 370 . Whether it is to be taken to offer a similar liability of Delaware owners to foreign subjects, Mulhall v. FallonSearch
-
it created an obligatio -- a personal liability of the owner of the Hamilton to the claimants. Slater v. MexicanSearch
-
not deny existence must be recognized, whether admiralty liens or not. This is not only a general principle, Andrews v. WallSearch
-
it to be proved against the fund. The Albert Dumois, 177 U. S. 240 , 177 U. S. 260 . See Workman v. NewSearch
-
vessel. The contract between the seaman and the owners of the Saginaw does not affect the case. Erie R. Co. v. ErieSearch
-
Workman v. NewSearch
-
Butler v. BostonSearch
-
Martin v. HunterSearch
-
American Steamboat Co. v. ChaseSearch
-
Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
McDonald v. MallorySearch
-
See Workman v. NewSearch
-
Mulhall v. FallonSearch
-
Slater v. MexicanSearch
-
Erie R. Co. v. ErieSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial