Citation network
Lochner Vs. New York
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 17, 1906
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Lochner v. NewSearch
-
York - 198 U.S. 45 (1906) U.S. Supreme Court Lochner v. NewSearch
-
York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905) Lochner v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
is part of the liberty of the individual protected by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSearch
-
the exercise of those powers, and with such conditions the Fourteenth Amendment was not designed to interfere. Mugler v. KansasSearch
-
statutes thus assailed. Among the later cases where the state law has been upheld by this court is that of Holden v. HardySearch
-
under which the slightest violation of the provisions of the act would be innocent. There is nothing in Holden v. HardySearch
-
which covers the case now before us. Nor does Atkin v. KansasSearch
-
the condition upon which it will permit work of a public character to be done for a municipality. Knoxville Iron Co. v. HarbisonSearch
-
by the miner to the employer. The latest case decided by this court involving the police power is that of Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
That case is also far from covering the one now before the court. Petit v. MinnesotaSearch
-
as we have already stated, from the expressions of this court in regard to laws of this nature, as stated in Holden v. HardySearch
-
and Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
and occupations of the people seems to be on the increase. In the Supreme Court of New York, in the case of People v. BeattieSearch
-
was unconstitutional as an illegitimate exercise of the police power. The Supreme Court of Illinois in Bessette v. PeopleSearch
-
such calling as he may choose, subject only to the restraint necessary secure the common welfare. See also Godcharles v. WigemanSearch
-
Low v. ReesSearch
-
from the natural effect of such statutes when put into operation, and not from their proclaimed purpose. Minnesota v. BarberSearch
-
U. S. 78 . The court looks beyond the mere letter of the law in such cases. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
health, and the safety of the public against the injurious exercise by any citizen of his own rights. In Patterson v. KentuckySearch
-
So, in Barbier v. ConnollySearch
-
This was declared Page 198 U. S. 66 in Allgeyer v. LouisianaSearch
-
P. 165 U. S. 591 ). So, as said in Holden v. HardySearch
-
and protection, or the safety of adjacent property. While this court has held, notably in the cases of Davidson v. NewSearch
-
Orleans, 96 U. S. 97 , and Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
Subsequently in Gundling v. ChicagoSearch
-
As stated in Crowley v. ChristensenSearch
-
Ry. v. PaulSearch
-
U. S. 404 , 173 U. S. 409 , and in Knoxville Iron Co. v. HarbisonSearch
-
or held invalid unless it be, beyond question, plainly and palpably in excess of legislative power. In Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
citing Mugler v. KansasSearch
-
is questioned, the burden of proof, so to speak, is upon those who assert it to be unconstitutional. McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
relation between the means employed by the State and the end sought to be accomplished by its legislation. Mugler v. KansasSearch
-
no appropriate or direct connection with that protection to health which each State owes to her citizens, Patterson v. KentuckySearch
-
or that it is not promotive of the health of the employees in question, Holden v. HardySearch
-
or that the regulation prescribed by the State is utterly unreasonable and extravagant or wholly arbitrary, Gundling v. ChicagoSearch
-
that the statute is, beyond question, a plain, palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics. The other day, we sustained the Massachusetts vaccination law. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial