Citation network
Devine Vs. Los Angeles
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 14, 1906
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Devine v. LosSearch
-
Angeles - 202 U.S. 313 (1906) U.S. Supreme Court Devine v. LosSearch
-
Angeles, 202 U.S. 313 (1906) Devine v. LosSearch
-
Mining Company v. MontanaSearch
-
is not necessary that the complaint should allege the nature of the estate or interest claimed by the defendant. Head v. FordyceSearch
-
Castro v. BarrySearch
-
Mining Company v. MiningSearch
-
the general rule as to that is thus stated by MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, speaking for the Court, in Boston Mining Company v. MontanaSearch
-
allegations of the defense which the defendants intend to set up or which they rely upon. Third Street Railway Company v. LewisSearch
-
test as to when a cloud is or is not cast, as stated by Mr. Justice Field, then Chief Justice of California, in Pixley v. HugginsSearch
-
Cal. 127, and reasserted in Hannewinkle v. GeorgetownSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
conferred on the city such rights in respect of the waters of the river as may have been vested in the state. Hooker v. LosSearch
-
in the present bill. It originated in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles under the title of Los Angeles v. PomeroySearch
-
or the Revised Statutes, that was inapplicable. Holt v. IndianaSearch
-
or rights, as put forward in the bill, are not federal questions, but questions of state or general law. In Hooker v. LosSearch
-
was one of state law and of general public law, on which the decision of the state court was final. San Francisco v. ScottSearch
-
Crystal Springs Land & Water Company v. LosSearch
-
of the acts. The bill was dismissed, and we affirmed the judgment. We there cited, among other cases, Phillips v. MoundSearch
-
City Association, 124 U. S. 605 , and Robinson v. AndersonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Devine v. LosSearch
-
Head v. FordyceSearch
-
Boston Mining Company v. MontanaSearch
-
Third Street Railway Company v. LewisSearch
-
Pixley v. HugginsSearch
-
Hooker v. LosSearch
-
of Los Angeles v. PomeroySearch
-
Holt v. IndianaSearch
-
In Hooker v. LosSearch
-
San Francisco v. ScottSearch
-
Phillips v. MoundSearch
-
and Robinson v. AndersonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial