Citation network
Madisonville Traction Co. Vs. St. Bernard Mining Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 16, 1905
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
lose jurisdiction to proceed further, and all subsequent proceedings in that court will be void. Railroad Company v. MississippiSearch
-
Railroad v. KoontzSearch
-
St. Paul & Chicago Ry. Co. v. McLeanSearch
-
Crehore v. OhioSearch
-
the party against whom a cause has been legally removed from taking further steps in the state court. French v. HaySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Moran v. SturgessSearch
-
U. S. 256 , 154 U. S. 270 . See also Sargent v. HeltonSearch
-
Gates v. BuckiSearch
-
Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. KutemanSearch
-
Iron Mountain R. Co. v. MemphisSearch
-
James v. CentralSearch
-
is not bound to surrender its jurisdiction, and may proceed as if no application for removal had been made. Stone v. SouthSearch
-
Railway Co. v. DunnSearch
-
Page 196 U. S. 246 it could have been brought originally in the circuit court of the United States. Tennessee v. UnionSearch
-
Mexican Nat. R. Co. v. DavidsonSearch
-
Minnesota v. NorthernSearch
-
defining the judicial power of the United States, Chief Justice Marshall, speaking for the court in Osborn v. BankSearch
-
In Kohl v. UnitedSearch
-
Two cases very much in point are Boom Co. v. PattersonSearch
-
U. S. 403 , and Searl v. SchoolSearch
-
District No. 2, 124 U. S. 197 . Boom Co. v. PattersonSearch
-
extending the judicial power of the United States, to controversies between citizens of different states. Paul v. VirginiaSearch
-
Wall. 177. And in Gaines v. FuentesSearch
-
Searl v. SchoolSearch
-
Such a proceeding, according to the decision of this Court in Kohl v. UnitedSearch
-
After referring to prior cases, including Boom Co. v. PattersonSearch
-
observed from an examination of the Searl case that this Court cited with approval Colorado Midland Railway Co. v. JonesSearch
-
F. 193, and the Mineral Range Railroad Co. v. DetroitSearch
-
BREWER, then circuit judge, after referring to the local statute under which the company proceeded, and to Boom Co. v. PattersonSearch
-
and Searl v. SchoolSearch
-
In Mineral Range R. Co. v. DetroitSearch
-
Copper Page 196 U. S. 250 Co., Mr. Justice Brown, then district judge, after referring to Boom Co. v. PattersonSearch
-
F. 520. In the more recent case of Smith v. AdamsSearch
-
charged with some duties of an administrative character, is a judicial tribunal and a court of record. Fletcher v. LeightSearch
-
Pennington v. WoolfolkSearch
-
That principle, this Court has said, grows out of the essential nature of all free governments. Loan Association v. TopekaSearch
-
made at the time of appropriation, to ascertain and secure the compensation to be made to the owner. Cherokee Nation v. SouthernSearch
-
Western Union Tel. Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
principles is inconsistent with the due process of law prescribed by the Fourteenth Amendment. C., B. & Q. R. Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
Co. v. NationalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial