Citation network
Kehrer Vs. Stewart
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 27, 1905
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 60 (1905) U.S. Supreme Court Kehrer v. StewartSearch
-
U.S. 60 (1905) Kehrer v. StewartSearch
-
opinion, and by both parties hereto, that a tax upon the seller of goods is a tax upon the goods themselves, Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
Welton v. MissouriSearch
-
and consigned to the purchaser in the State of Georgia, was an illegal interference with interstate commerce. Caldwell v. NorthSearch
-
Ry. Co. v. SimsSearch
-
Stone v. StateSearch
-
business were carried on in the same or different buildings. In this particular, the case is covered by that of Brown v. HoustonSearch
-
purpose of being taken out of the country on a vessel bound to a foreign port. The same principle was applied in Ement v. MissouriSearch
-
residents and products of the state and of those of other states, was sustained. To the same effect is Machine Company v. GageSearch
-
U. S. 676 . The case is readily distinguishable from that of Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
The same doctrine was applied to telegraph companies in Leloup v. MobileSearch
-
This case, however, must be read Page 197 U. S. 67 in connection with the Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. CharlestonSearch
-
of the police power, and not an interference with interstate commerce. In line with this case is that of Ratterman v. WesternSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
but valid as applied to receipts from messages within the state. To the same effect is Western Union Tel. Co. v. AlabamaSearch
-
run throughout the United States, such assessment does not impinge upon the power of Congress. Pullman's Car Company v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
domestic commerce seeing that the corporation is free to abandon the business taxed if it sees fit. Pullman Company v. AdamsSearch
-
Allen v. PullmanSearch
-
Page 197 U. S. 68 be interstate in its character. This contingency, however, is met by the case of Osborne v. FloridaSearch
-
and only five percent consisted of carrying goods and freight between points within the State of Florida. Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
might be held to be strictly incidental to an interstate business, and in reality a part of it, as we held in Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
upon different occupations. Such has been constantly the practice of Congress under the internal revenue laws. Cook v. MarshallSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Kehrer v. StewartSearch
-
Brown v. MarylandSearch
-
Caldwell v. NorthSearch
-
of Brown v. HoustonSearch
-
Ement v. MissouriSearch
-
of Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
Leloup v. MobileSearch
-
the Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. CharlestonSearch
-
of Ratterman v. WesternSearch
-
Western Union Tel. Co. v. AlabamaSearch
-
of Congress. Pullman's Car Company v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Pullman Company v. AdamsSearch
-
of Osborne v. FloridaSearch
-
the State of Florida. Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
Crutcher v. KentuckySearch
-
Cook v. MarshallSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial