Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Harris Vs. Balk

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 08, 1905

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 29 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 215 (1905) U.S. Supreme Court Harris v. Balk
    Search
  2. U.S. 215 (1905) Harris v. Balk
    Search
  3. over the person of the garnishee confers jurisdiction on the courts of the state where the writ issues. Blackstone v. Miller
    Search
  4. is laid. His obligation to pay to his creditor is thereby arrested, and a lien created upon the debt itself. Cahoon v. Morgan
    Search
  5. National Fire Ins. Co. v. Chambers
    Search
  6. the garnishee, and the judgment condemning the amount in his hands becomes a personal judgment against him. Buschman v. Hanna
    Search
  7. being within the state is but temporary. See pp. 289, 290. This is the doctrine which is also adopted in Morgan v. Neville
    Search
  8. Co. v. Lang
    Search
  9. in Lancashire Ins. Co. v. Corbetts
    Search
  10. Ill. 592, and in Harvey v. Great
    Search
  11. Northern Ry. Co., 50 Minn. 405, 406-407, and to the same effect is Embree v. Hanna
    Search
  12. also Savin v. Bond
    Search
  13. no error in granting the prayer of the appellee that such judgment was conclusive. The case in 138 N.Y. 209, Douglass v. Phenix
    Search
  14. to attachment by the service upon an agent of the company within that state. The general principle laid down in Embree v. Hanna
    Search
  15. Ry. Co. v. Sturm
    Search
  16. against the claim of the person suing out the attachment. This duty is affirmed in the case above cited of Morgan v. Neville
    Search
  17. Pa. 52, and is spoken of in Railroad Co. v. Sturm
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court Harris v. Balk
    Search
  19. Blackstone v. Miller
    Search
  20. Cahoon v. Morgan
    Search
  21. Buschman v. Hanna
    Search
  22. Morgan v. Neville
    Search
  23. Lancashire Ins. Co. v. Corbetts
    Search
  24. Harvey v. Great
    Search
  25. Embree v. Hanna
    Search
  26. Savin v. Bond
    Search
  27. Douglass v. Phenix
    Search
  28. of Morgan v. Neville
    Search
  29. Railroad Co. v. Sturm
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales