Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

The Eliza Lines

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Oct 30, 1905

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

54 entries 1 linked 53 unlinked
Show
  1. Roehm Vs. Horst US Supreme Court · May 14, 1900
  2. the voyage was not completed. The decree was not upon a new contract, such as it was attempted to set up in Hopper v. Burness
    Search
  3. the recovery cannot exceed Page 199 U. S. 127 the benefit, as often has been explained in the books. Gillis v. Cobe
    Search
  4. Keener, Quasi-Contracts, Ch. 4. See Flaherty v. Doane
    Search
  5. before he became a justice of this Court, in his Edition of Abbott on Shipping (1810), pp. 338, 512, citing Dunnett v. Tomhagen
    Search
  6. Johns. 154, and Mason v. The
    Search
  7. U. S. 128 to prove that he changed his opinion. That case is cited in 3 Kent Comm. 13th ed. 228, along with Post v. Robertson
    Search
  8. Johns. 24, in which, and in Dunnett v. Tomhagen
    Search
  9. meruit when benefits were accepted under the contract, in spite of a failure of complete performance. See Caze v. Baltimore
    Search
  10. Kent Comm. 229. Other cases are Smith v. The
    Search
  11. of a contract, amounting to a breach, warrants the other party in going no further in performance on his side. Roehm v. Horst
    Search
  12. U. S. 1 . But the same thing is true of an absolute repudiation not amounting to a breach. Frost v. Knight
    Search
  13. Phillpotts v. Evans
    Search
  14. Ballou v. Billings
    Search
  15. with which the act is done, as practically to destroy the value of the contract to the cargo owner, see Swift & Co. v. United
    Search
  16. on his side. The principle is not peculiar to charter parties, it is illustrated in other parts of the law. See Roehm v. Horst
    Search
  17. It has been held on this ground that duress created by fear of immediate death did not excuse a trespass. Gilbert v. Stone
    Search
  18. Scott v. Shepherd
    Search
  19. W.Bl. 892, 896. See Miller v. Horton
    Search
  20. a similar plea in the case of shipwrecked men at sea did not prevent the killing of one of them being murder. Queen v. Dudley
    Search
  21. Q.B.D. 273. See United States v. Holmes
    Search
  22. has been created by a stranger, and is unknown to the party, the contract stands. Keilwey, 154a. pl. 3. Fairbanks v. Snow
    Search
  23. until avoided, and cannot be set aside when the property has passed to a purchaser without notice. Bainbrigge v. Browne
    Search
  24. Clark v. Pease
    Search
  25. Hunter v. Prinsep
    Search
  26. Post v. Robertson
    Search
  27. the performance of the contract. The shipper cannot recover his cargo except upon the payment of full freight. Tindall v. Taylor
    Search
  28. may substitute a new contract for the original one. Neither party, however, can be compelled to this course. Post v. Robertson
    Search
  29. and the authorities on this question, both in this country and in England, settle this beyond controversy, Cargo v. Galam
    Search
  30. Shipton v. Thornton
    Search
  31. used in the law of marine insurance, where a vessel, after such disaster, is abandoned to the underwriters. Thornely v. Hebson
    Search
  32. Sumner 542, is still more indefinite in its treatment of the subject herein involved. So, in the case of Dunnett v. Tomhagen
    Search
  33. because no freight was earned on the homeward voyage, no part of the cargo being delivered by the ship. In Post v. Robertson
    Search
  34. Hopper v. Burness
    Search
  35. Gillis v. Cobe
    Search
  36. See Flaherty v. Doane
    Search
  37. Dunnett v. Tomhagen
    Search
  38. and Mason v. The
    Search
  39. See Caze v. Baltimore
    Search
  40. Smith v. The
    Search
  41. Frost v. Knight
    Search
  42. Swift & Co. v. United
    Search
  43. See Roehm v. Horst
    Search
  44. Gilbert v. Stone
    Search
  45. See Miller v. Horton
    Search
  46. Queen v. Dudley
    Search
  47. See United States v. Holmes
    Search
  48. Fairbanks v. Snow
    Search
  49. Bainbrigge v. Browne
    Search
  50. Tindall v. Taylor
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial