Citation network
Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. Vs. Mcclain
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 23, 1904
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 397 (1904) U.S. Supreme Court Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClainSearch
-
U.S. 397 (1904) Spreckels Sugar Refining Company v. McClainSearch
-
States, this Court alone would have had jurisdiction to review the judgment of the circuit court. Huguley Mfg. Co. v. GaletonSearch
-
in that court upon the merits, prosecute a writ of error directly from the circuit court to this Court. Robinson v. CaldwellSearch
-
Loeb v. ColumbiaSearch
-
former decisions, although the precise point here was not involved in any of them. In American Sugar Refining Company v. NewSearch
-
It was held in Loeb v. ColumbiaSearch
-
and also on grounds independent of that -- a question expressly reserved in Colorado Central Mining Company v. TurckSearch
-
section six, because the jurisdiction would not depend solely on diverse citizenship. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. HarrisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In Huguley Manufacturing Company v. GaletonSearch
-
circuit court of appeals, in which event the final judgment of that court could not be brought here as of right. Loeb v. ColumbiaSearch
-
the decision of that court would not be made final, and appeal or writ of error would lie. American Sugar Company v. NewSearch
-
decided that we do not deem it necessary to consider it anew upon principle. It was held in Pacific Insurance Company v. SouleSearch
-
in Veazie Bank v. FennoSearch
-
be classed under the head of duties which were to be sustained upon the principles announced in Pacific Insurance Co. v. SouleSearch
-
in Scholey v. RewSearch
-
in Nicol v. AmesSearch
-
in Knowlton v. MooreSearch
-
and, in Patton v. BradySearch
-
their receipts were its receipts, and as such they were properly comprised in the assessment. Adams Express Company v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClainSearch
-
Spreckels Sugar Refining Company v. McClainSearch
-
Huguley Mfg. Co. v. GaletonSearch
-
Court. Robinson v. CaldwellSearch
-
In American Sugar Refining Company v. NewSearch
-
Colorado Central Mining Company v. TurckSearch
-
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. HarrisSearch
-
American Sugar Company v. NewSearch
-
Pacific Insurance Co. v. SouleSearch
-
Knowlton v. MooreSearch
-
Adams Express Company v. OhioSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial