Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Security Land and Exploration Co. Vs. Burns

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 29, 1904

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 3 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. St. Clair County Vs. Lovingston US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1873
  2. Horne Vs. Smith US Supreme Court · Jun 03, 1895
  3. CragIn Vs. Powell US Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1888
  4. Security Land & Exploration Co. v. Burns
    Search
  5. U.S. 167 (1904) U.S. Supreme Court Security Land & Exploration Co. v. Burns
    Search
  6. U.S. 167 (1904) Security Land and Exploration Company v. Burns
    Search
  7. were entitled to, a boundary upon a lake. In support of these contentions, the plaintiff in error cited Cragin v. Powell
    Search
  8. U. S. 691 , and Jefferis v. East
    Search
  9. of a grant according to an official plat of a survey referred to in the grant, and to the cases of McIver's Lessee v. Walker
    Search
  10. Newsom v. Pryor
    Search
  11. Land Co. v. Saunders
    Search
  12. accuracy within some reasonable distance, and places the monument somewhere near where it really exists. White v. Luning
    Search
  13. Ainsa v. United
    Search
  14. Baldwin v. Brown
    Search
  15. Railroad Company v. Stigeler
    Search
  16. Higginbotham v. Stoddard
    Search
  17. Page 193 U. S. 180 Hall v. Eaton
    Search
  18. the intention was to convey no more than the number of acres actually surveyed and mentioned in the patents. In Ainsa v. United
    Search
  19. no aid of a court of equity is necessary to sustain such a defense. We think the French-Glenn Live Stock Company v. Springer
    Search
  20. a line of boundary limiting the land conveyed or described by the line itself, and not by any body of water. See Niles v. Cedar
    Search
  21. has received all the land that he actually paid for. It appears from the various reports of the case of Kirwan v. Murphy
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Security Land & Exploration Co. v. Burns
    Search
  23. Security Land and Exploration Company v. Burns
    Search
  24. and Jefferis v. East
    Search
  25. of McIver's Lessee v. Walker
    Search
  26. White v. Luning
    Search
  27. Hall v. Eaton
    Search
  28. In Ainsa v. United
    Search
  29. the French-Glenn Live Stock Company v. Springer
    Search
  30. See Niles v. Cedar
    Search
  31. of Kirwan v. Murphy
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial