Citation network
Fargo Vs. Hart
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 21, 1904
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 490 (1904) U.S. Supreme Court Fargo v. HartSearch
-
U.S. 490 (1904) Fargo v. HartSearch
-
commissioners has undertaken to tax the property of the company under the law which was upheld in American Express Co. v. IndianaSearch
-
Adams Express Co. v. OhioSearch
-
assets is only as a means of getting at the true cash value of property within the state. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. TaggartSearch
-
Pullman's Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
we have called the organic relation of the property in the state to the whole system. Western Union Telegraph Company v. TaggartSearch
-
would be taxing property outside of the state under a pretense. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. BackusSearch
-
principle applies to personal property which the state would not have the right to tax directly. Adams Express Co. v. OhioSearch
-
s.c., 166 U. S. 166 U.S. 185, 166 U. S. 222 -223. In Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. v. BackusSearch
-
U. S. 272 , 191 U. S. 281 . See also Santa Clara County v. SouthernSearch
-
California v. CentralSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Central Pacific Railroad v. CaliforniaSearch
-
board of tax commissioners acted without jurisdiction, according to the decision of the Supreme Court of Indiana. Hart v. SmithSearch
-
Tax Cases, 92 U. S. 575 . But it was recognized in the passage just quoted from People's National Bank v. MaryeSearch
-
may be proper. The course adopted is the same that was taken without criticism from the court in Adams Express Co. v. OhioSearch
-
of each of the counties of the state, and we are of opinion that the bill may be maintained. Union Pacific Ry. v. CheyenneSearch
-
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. v. BoardSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Fargo v. HartSearch
-
Western Union Telegraph Company v. TaggartSearch
-
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. BackusSearch
-
In Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. v. BackusSearch
-
Santa Clara County v. SouthernSearch
-
of the Supreme Court of Indiana. Hart v. SmithSearch
-
Union Pacific Ry. v. CheyenneSearch
-
Adams Express Co. v. KentuckySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial