Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Bradley Vs. Lightcap

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 31, 1904

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 1 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. Barnitz Vs. Beverly US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1896
  2. U.S. 1 (1904) U.S. Supreme Court Bradley v. Lightcap
    Search
  3. U.S. 1 (1904) Bradley v. Lightcap
    Search
  4. no penalty or loss of right to the purchaser by reason of delay or failure in taking out such deed. In Rucker v. Dooley
    Search
  5. to redeem within twelve months by making full payment. The law in general as it is today was thus declared in Ware v. Schintz
    Search
  6. is the legal owner of the mortgaged estate as against all persons, excepting the mortgagee or his assignees. Delahay v. Clement
    Search
  7. Vansant v. Allmon
    Search
  8. Carroll v. Ballance
    Search
  9. Oldham v. Pfleger
    Search
  10. Fountain v. Bookstaver
    Search
  11. Esker v. Hefferman
    Search
  12. or becomes barred by the statute of limitations, the mortgagee's title is extinguished by operation of law. Pollock v. Maison
    Search
  13. Harris v. Mills
    Search
  14. Gibson v. Rees
    Search
  15. Barrett v. Hinckley
    Search
  16. Lightcap v. Bradley
    Search
  17. to the denial of rights accruing by a prior contract are obnoxious to constitutional objection. In Bronson v. Kinzie
    Search
  18. In Barnitz v. Beverly
    Search
  19. could not apply to a sale under a mortgage executed before its passage, and Mr. Justice Shiras, referring to Brine v. Insurance
    Search
  20. In Hooker v. Burr
    Search
  21. where the mortgagee bids the whole amount of the mortgage debt, as in Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Cushman
    Search
  22. of the execution of the mortgage, which had been reduced before the sale, though subsequent to the mortgage. Barnitz v. Beverly
    Search
  23. but where the bid is for less than the full amount, a different rule would be applicable. Bogardus v. Moses
    Search
  24. foreclosure and sale, purchase and deed are in aid of the original title, and not inconsistent with it. Williams v. Brunton
    Search
  25. decline jurisdiction because of a construction that we deem untenable. Page 195 U. S. 23 Louisville Gas Co. v. Citizens'
    Search
  26. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Company v. Indiana
    Search
  27. so as to take away the shield afforded by possession. Rightful possession is a defense in ejectment ( Sands v. Wacaser
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Bradley v. Lightcap
    Search
  29. In Rucker v. Dooley
    Search
  30. Ware v. Schintz
    Search
  31. Delahay v. Clement
    Search
  32. Pollock v. Maison
    Search
  33. In Bronson v. Kinzie
    Search
  34. Brine v. Insurance
    Search
  35. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Cushman
    Search
  36. Bogardus v. Moses
    Search
  37. Williams v. Brunton
    Search
  38. Louisville Gas Co. v. Citizens'
    Search
  39. Sands v. Wacaser
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial