Citation network
Mobile Transportation Co. Vs. Mobile
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 06, 1903
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 479 (1903) U.S. Supreme Court Mobile Transportation Co. v. MobileSearch
-
U.S. 479 (1903) Mobile Transportation Company v. MobileSearch
-
the navigable waters below high water mark within the limits of the state, not previously granted. Pollard's Lessee v. HaganSearch
-
manage the shore and soil granted in such manner as they may deem best for the public good. Illinois Central R. Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
mark within the limits of the state, not previously granted, was so conclusively settled by this Court in Pollard v. HaganSearch
-
pronounced in 1844. Prior to this time, however, and in 1839, the Supreme Court of Alabama, in the case of Mobile v. EslavaSearch
-
mark. This was also declared to be the doctrine of the Supreme Court of Alabama as late as 1853, when, in Magee v. HallettSearch
-
as well as those of the Supreme Court of the United States, extend beyond high water mark at that time, citing Pollard v. HaganSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Abbot v. KennedySearch
-
Ala. 393, and Goodtitle v. KibbeSearch
-
How. 471. This last case was little more than an affirmance of Pollard v. HaganSearch
-
In Boulo v. NewSearch
-
formed which was not usually covered by water at high tide. It was held the title was in the state. In Williams v. GloverSearch
-
and at its ordinary stage. No reference was made to the prior authorities respecting tide waters. In Demopolis v. WebbSearch
-
citing Williams v. GloverSearch
-
at this point apparently far above the tidal effect. In the same case afterwards before the court on its merits, Webb v. DemopolisSearch
-
or to low water mark, or to the middle thread of the stream, was not a federal, but a local, question, citing Barney v. KeokukSearch
-
U. S. 371 , and Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. GreenSearch
-
related to tidal streams. In its opinion in this case, the Supreme Court of Alabama seems to admit that, in Webb v. DemopolisSearch
-
The law is definitely settled as to this point, and it could hardly have been the purpose of the decision in Webb v. DemopolisSearch
-
variation in height. In regard to this class of cases, the rule laid down by the Supreme Court of Alabama in Mobile v. EslavaSearch
-
ownership extends only to high water mark has been consistently adhered to ever since, and notably so in Kennedy v. BeebeSearch
-
Pollard v. GreitSearch
-
Magee v. HallettSearch
-
Boulo v. NewSearch
-
hand, in the cases which Page 187 U. S. 487 hold that private ownership extends to low water mark, Bullock v. WilsonSearch
-
Williams v. GloverSearch
-
Demopolis v. WebbSearch
-
Ala. 659, and Webb v. DemopolisSearch
-
others by the thread of the stream. Some of these cases are mentioned in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bradley in Hardin v. JordanSearch
-
U. S. 488 upon tidewaters, its decision in that regard cannot be reviewed by this Court. Central Land Co. v. LaidleySearch
-
but it was fully settled by this Court with respect to these titles in Pollard v. HaganSearch
-
How. 471, and Hallett v. BeebeSearch
-
do by the act of 1867, much reliance is placed by the transportation company upon the case of Illinois Central R. Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Mobile Transportation Co. v. MobileSearch
-
Mobile Transportation Company v. MobileSearch
-
Pollard v. HaganSearch
-
of Mobile v. EslavaSearch
-
and Goodtitle v. KibbeSearch
-
of Pollard v. HaganSearch
-
In Williams v. GloverSearch
-
In Demopolis v. WebbSearch
-
Webb v. DemopolisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial