Citation network
Randolph Vs. Scruggs
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 18, 1903
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 533 (1903) U.S. Supreme Court Randolph v. ScruggsSearch
-
U.S. 533 (1903) Randolph v. ScruggsSearch
-
so far as it interferes with his administering the property assigned. This could not be denied. West Company v. LeaSearch
-
Davis v. BohleSearch
-
It seems to us that it would be a hard and subtle construction to say, as seems to have been thought in Bartlett v. BramhallSearch
-
by state decisions with reference to similar questions raised by creditors or under state insolvent laws. Bigelow v. BaldwinSearch
-
White v. HillSearch
-
Clark v. SawyerSearch
-
Wakeman v. GroverSearch
-
Paige 23, 43, S.C., 11 Wend. 187, 226. See also Mayer v. HellmanSearch
-
properly might have been paid by the assignee they may prove for now. See Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Georgia v. PettusSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Mason v. PomeroySearch
-
it does not command our assent. The case would be different if the assignee were party to an actual fraud. Hastings v. SpencerSearch
-
Smith v. WiseSearch
-
Perry-Mason Shoe Co. v. SykesSearch
-
or benefit of the estate, the mere fiction of relation is not enough to forbid an allowance for them. See Lynch v. BernalSearch
-
assignments, and of the better-considered decisions under Page 190 U. S. 539 the bankrupt laws. Platt v. ArcherSearch
-
Havemeyer v. LoebSearch
-
Macdonald v. MooreSearch
-
Wald v. WehlSearch
-
Hunker v. BingSearch
-
Collumb v. ReadSearch
-
T. T. Haydock Carriage Co. v. PierSearch
-
Miss. 390. See Williams v. GibbesSearch
-
Thompson v. PhenixSearch
-
Woodruff v. NewSearch
-
from the property which the assignee is required to surrender, and in that way they gain a preference. Platt v. ArcherSearch
-
extent. No ground appears for allowing the item for services in resisting an adjudication of bankruptcy. See Platt v. ArcherSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Randolph v. ScruggsSearch
-
West Company v. LeaSearch
-
Bartlett v. BramhallSearch
-
Bigelow v. BaldwinSearch
-
See Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Georgia v. PettusSearch
-
Hastings v. SpencerSearch
-
See Lynch v. BernalSearch
-
Platt v. ArcherSearch
-
See Williams v. GibbesSearch
-
See Platt v. ArcherSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial