Citation network
Stanley County Vs. Coler
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 01, 1903
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 437 (1903) U.S. Supreme Court Stanley County v. ColerSearch
-
U.S. 437 (1903) Stanley County v. ColerSearch
-
bonds, and averred that their invalidity was adjudged by the supreme court of the state in the case of Commissioners v. SnuggsSearch
-
but that the said decision is uniform with the decision of the same court, delivered in the case of Bank v. CommissionersSearch
-
provision requiring the yeas and nays to be entered upon the journals of each house of the general assembly. Bank v. CommissionersSearch
-
Stanly County v. SnuggsSearch
-
N.C. 394. The ruling was decided to be binding upon this Court. Wilkes County v. ColerSearch
-
the constitution of 1868, and were passed upon and interpreted by the Supreme Court of North Carolina in Stanly County v. SnuggsSearch
-
exceptions to the rule, and the case at bar presents one of them. The rule and its exceptions are stated in Burgess v. SeligmanSearch
-
was applied in Folsom v. TownshipSearch
-
construed the constitution and statutes for ourselves, and sustained the bonds. It was, however, said in Burgess v. SeligmanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
But we are unable to yield that deference to the decision in Stanly County v. SnuggsSearch
-
These conditions, as we have also seen, were defined to mean, by the supreme court of the state, in Stanly County v. SnuggsSearch
-
and does accompany and guarantee the bonds in every financial market. And this Court has so decided. In Evansville v. DennettSearch
-
Passing on the second series of bonds, and expressing the principle applicable, School District v. StoneSearch
-
Coloma v. EavesSearch
-
Commissioners v. BollesSearch
-
Anderson County v. BealSearch
-
U. S. 227 , 113 U. S. 238 -239, and authorities there cited Cairo v. ZaneSearch
-
so issued created an indebtedness in excess of the limit prescribed by the Constitution of Colorado. See also Waite v. SantaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Stanley County v. ColerSearch
-
of Commissioners v. SnuggsSearch
-
of Bank v. CommissionersSearch
-
Bank v. CommissionersSearch
-
Court. Wilkes County v. ColerSearch
-
Folsom v. TownshipSearch
-
In Evansville v. DennettSearch
-
Waite v. SantaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial