Citation network
Metcalf Vs. Barker
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 01, 1902
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 165 (1902) U.S. Supreme Court Metcalf v. BarkerSearch
-
U.S. 165 (1902) Metcalf v. BarkerSearch
-
an order in bankruptcy proceedings against the defendants enjoining him from enforcing such lien. See also Pickens v. RoySearch
-
creditors' bill and service of process creates a lien in equity on the judgment debtor's equitable assets. Miller v. SherrySearch
-
Freedman's Savings & Trust Company v. EarleSearch
-
U. S. 710 . And such is the rule in New York. Storm v. WaddellSearch
-
Lynch v. JohnsonSearch
-
First National Bank v. ShulerSearch
-
subject was fully discussed, and the effect of bankruptcy proceedings considered, by Vice Chancellor Sandford in Storm v. WaddellSearch
-
so repeatedly recognized with approval as to have become a leading case. As Mr. Justice Swayne remarked, in Miller v. SherrySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the right to payment out of the fund so vested cannot be affected by a subsequent transfer by the debtor, McDermutt v. StrongSearch
-
Johns.Ch. 687, or taken away by a subsequent discharge in bankruptcy. Hill v. HardingSearch
-
How. 612. Kittredge v. WarrenSearch
-
N.H. 509, was relied on as to the effect of attachments on mesne process in New Hampshire, in Peck v. JennessSearch
-
have also the Supreme Court of Rhode Island and the chancery court of New Jersey in well considered decisions. Doyle v. HeathSearch
-
Taylor v. TaylorSearch
-
N.J.Eq. 86. And see Wakeman v. ThrockmortonSearch
-
this draws to it the right to decide upon conflicting claims to its ultimate possession and control. In Peck v. JennessSearch
-
The rule indicated was applied under the act of 1841 in Clarke v. RistSearch
-
under the act of 1867, by Mr. Justice Miller in Johnson v. BishopSearch
-
Woolw. 324, and by Mr. Justice Nelson in Sedgwick v. MenckSearch
-
and under the act of 1898, among other cases, by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Frazier v. SouthernSearch
-
Loan & Trust Co., 99 F. 707, and Pickens v. DentSearch
-
of the district court to make the injunction order in question cannot be maintained. Louisville Trust Company v. ComingorSearch
-
Affirmed by this Court sub nomine Pickens v. RoySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Metcalf v. BarkerSearch
-
Miller v. SherrySearch
-
New York. Storm v. WaddellSearch
-
Storm v. WaddellSearch
-
McDermutt v. StrongSearch
-
Kittredge v. WarrenSearch
-
Doyle v. HeathSearch
-
Wakeman v. ThrockmortonSearch
-
In Peck v. JennessSearch
-
Clarke v. RistSearch
-
Johnson v. BishopSearch
-
Sedgwick v. MenckSearch
-
Frazier v. SouthernSearch
-
and Pickens v. DentSearch
-
Louisville Trust Company v. ComingorSearch
-
Hill v. HardingSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial